Evaluation the Influence of Soil Solution Chemistry on Soluble Nickel Toxicity to Bok Choy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nickel (Ni) is an essential element for plants but it is toxic at large concentrations. In the present study, bioassays of bok choy were taken in 17 Chinese soils with different properties and climate characteristics to evaluate the toxicity of soil soluble nickel (Ni) toxicity in soil pore water to bok choy. The tested soils were spiked with 8 levels of soluble Ni chloride with or without leaching treatments. The effective soluble Ni concentrations that caused 10% root growth inhibition (EC10) and 50% inhibition (EC50) varied widely from 0.05 to 2.1 mg/L and from 0.13 to 7.6 mg/L in 17 unleached soils, represented 41.8 to 58.5 folds differences, and from 0.08 to 2.2 mg/L and from 0.47 to 4.5 mg/L in leached soils, represented 27 to 9.6 folds differences. It indicated that the soil soluble properties greatly influenced Ni toxicity to bok choy. However, soluble Ni toxicity thresholds were not significantly decreased in 15 soils. Regression models between soil solution properties and phytotoxicity threshold values were developed. The model showed that soil solution Mg2+K+ and electrical conductivity (EC) were the important factors affecting Ni toxicity on bok choy, and meanwhile they were positively related to the toxicity thresholds. These quantitative relationships could be used for the risk assessment of Ni in terrestrial environment in China.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 750-752)

Pages:

1441-1447

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Jolanta, B. Stanisław: Relationship between the chemical form of nickel applied to the soil and its uptake and toxicity to barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L. ). Geoderma, Vol. 122 (2004), pp.247-255.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.011

Google Scholar

[2] L.P. Weng, T.M. Lexmond, A. Wolthoorn, E.J.M. Temminghoff, W.H. Van Riemsdijk: Phytotoxicity and bioavailability of nickel: chemical speciation and bioaccumulation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Vol. 22 (2004), pp.2180-2187.

DOI: 10.1897/02-116

Google Scholar

[3] C.P. Rooney, F.J. Zhao, S.P. McGrath: Phytotoxicity of nickel in a range of European soils: influence of soil properties, Ni solubility and speciation. Environ. Pollut. Vol. 145 (2007), pp.596-605.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.008

Google Scholar

[4] B. Li, H.T. Zhang, Y.B. Ma, M.J. McLaughlin: Influences of soil properties and leaching on nickel toxicity to barley root elongation [J]. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. Vol. 74 (2011), pp.459-466.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.10.021

Google Scholar

[5] M. McBride, S. Sauve, W. Hendershot: Solubility control of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in contaminated soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. Vol. 48 (1997), pp.337-346.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00554.x

Google Scholar

[6] F.J. Zhao, C.P. Rooney, H. Zhang, S.P. McGrath: Comparison of soil solution speciation and diffusive gradients in thin-films measurement as an indicator of copper bioavailability to plants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Vol. 25 (2006), pp.733-742.

DOI: 10.1897/04-603r.1

Google Scholar

[7] E. Meers, G. Du Laing, F.M.G. Tack, M.G. Verloo: Heavy metal displacement by exchangeable bases (Ca, Mg, K, Na) in soils and sediments. Soil Sci. Vol. 174 (2009), p. 202e209.

DOI: 10.1097/ss.0b013e31819f601a

Google Scholar

[8] K. Lock, H. Van Eeckhout, K.A. C De Schamphelaere, P. Criel, C.R. Janssen: Development of a biotic ligand model (BLM) predicting nickel toxicity to barley (Hordeum vulgare). Chemosphere. Vol. 66 (2007), pp.1346-1352.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.008

Google Scholar

[9] B. Li, X. Zhang, X.D. Wang, Y.B. Ma: Refining a biotic ligand model for nickel toxicity to barley root elongation in solution culture. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. Vol. 72 (2009), pp.1760-1766.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.05.003

Google Scholar

[10] D.S. Jenkinson, D.S. Powlson. The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil-V: A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 8 (1976), pp.209-213.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(76)90005-5

Google Scholar

[11] D.P. Stevens, M.J. McLaughlin, T. Heinrich: Determining toxicity of lead and zinc runoff in soils: salinity effects on metal partitioning and on phytotoxicity. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Vol. 22 (2003), pp.3017-3024.

DOI: 10.1897/02-290

Google Scholar

[12] K. Oorts, U. Ghesquiere, E. Smolders: Leaching and aging decrease nickel toxicity to soil microbial processes in soils freshly spiked with nickel chloride. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Vol. 26 (2007), pp.1130-1138.

DOI: 10.1897/06-533r.1

Google Scholar

[13] D.H. Thibault, M.I. Sheppard: A disposable system for soil pore-water extraction by centrifugation. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. Vol. 23 (1992), pp.1629-1641.

DOI: 10.1080/00103629209368692

Google Scholar

[14] L. Haanstra, P. Doelman, J.H.O. Voshaar: The use of sigmoidal dose response curves in soil ecotoxicological research. Plant Soil. Vol. 84 (1985), pp.293-297.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02143194

Google Scholar

[15] O. Schabenberger, B.E. Tharp, J.J. Kells, D. Penner: Statistical Tests for Hormesis and Effective Dosages in Herbicide Dose Response. Agron. J. Vol 4 (1999), pp.713-721.

DOI: 10.2134/agronj1999.914713x

Google Scholar

[16] B. Li: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. D. Beijing, (2010), pp.37-39.

Google Scholar

[17] D. Costantini, N.B. Metcalfe, P. Monaghan: Ecol. Lett. J. Vol. 11 (2010), pp.1435-1447.

Google Scholar

[18] B.J. Kefford, L. Zalizniak, M. St.J. Warne, D. Nugegoda: Environ. Pollut. Vol. 3 (2008), pp.516-23.

Google Scholar

[19] E.J. Calabrese: Environ. Pollut. Vol. 3 (2005), pp.379-411.

Google Scholar

[20] X.Q. Zhang, D.P. Wei, B. Li, Y.B. Ma, Z.B. Huang: accepted by Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability (2013).

Google Scholar

[21] X.Q. Zhang, D.P. Wei, B. Li, Y.B. Ma, Z.B. Huang: accepted by Soil China. (2013).

Google Scholar

[22] S. Shabala: Ann. Bot. Vol. 92 (2003), p.627 – 634.

Google Scholar

[23] A.A. Véry, H. Sentenac: Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. Vol. 54 (2003), pp.575-603.

Google Scholar

[24] X.L. Tang, M.H. Gu, L.M. Pan, G.Z. L, D.X. Q: Soil and Fertilizer Sciences China. Vol. 3 (2007), pp.47-51.

Google Scholar