A Modified Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm Brain MR Images Segmentation with Bias Field Compensation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance (MR) images is always required as a preprocessing stage in many brain analysis tasks. Nevertheless, the bias field (BF, also called intensity in-homogeneities) and noise in the MRI images always make the accurate segmentation difficult. In this paper, we present a modified FCM algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of brain MRI. Our method is formulated by modifying the objective function of the standard FCM algorithm. It aims to compensate for bias field and incorporate both the local and non-local information into the distance function to restrain the noise of the image. We have conducted extensive experimental and have compared our method with different types of FCM extension methods using simulated MRI images. The results show that our proposed method can deal with the bias field and noise effectively and outperforms other methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 756-759)

Pages:

1349-1355

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Pham DL, Xu CY, Prince JL, A survey of current methods in medical image segmentation. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 200; 2: 315-37 [Technical report version, Jhu/ECE 99-01, Johns Hopkins University].

Google Scholar

[2] C.R.G. Guttmann, R. Benson, S. Warfield, X. Wei, M. C. Anderson, C. B. Hall, et al. White matter abnormalities in mobility impaired older persons [J]. Neurology, 2000, 54(6): 1277-1283.

DOI: 10.1212/wnl.54.6.1277

Google Scholar

[3] Stephen M. Smith, Yongyue Zhang, Mark Jenkinson, Jacqueline Chen, P. M. Matthews, Antonio Federico, et al. Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross sectional brain change analysis [J]. NeuroImage, 2002, 17(1): 479-489.

DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1040

Google Scholar

[4] Wells III WM, Grimson WEL, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging 1996; 15: 429-42.

DOI: 10.1109/42.511747

Google Scholar

[5] Singh M, Patel P, Khosla D, Kim T, Segmentation of function MRI by K-means clustering. IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science 1996; 43: 2030-6.

DOI: 10.1109/23.507264

Google Scholar

[6] Heinonen T, Dastidar P, Eskola H, Frey H, Ryymin P, Laasonen E, Applicability of semi-automatic segmentation for volumetric analysis of brain lesions. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 1998; 22: 173-8.

DOI: 10.3109/03091909809032536

Google Scholar

[7] Bueno G, Musse O, Heitz F, Arm spach JP, 3D Watershed-based segmentation of internal structures within MR brain images. Medical images 2000: image processing. Proc SPIE 2000; 3979: 284-93.

DOI: 10.1117/12.387690

Google Scholar