Research on Consistency Verification of Semantic Business Process Model Based on SWRL

Article Preview

Abstract:

At the moment Semantic Business Process Model (SBPM) build on the semantic annotation, the specification of process activity, the control flow between activities and business functions of process. However, the correctness of SBPM is based on technical knowledge and experiences of the model designer, which is apparently not feasible for complex and dynamic business processes. Therefore, the goal of this paper is present a formalization description which was understood by business experts and model designers, establishing a new method to verify the consistency between SBPM and requirement of enterprise. Our techniques are based on the SWRL and Business rule.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 756-759)

Pages:

1595-1599

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Lautenbacher, B. Bauer, and C. Seitz, Semantic Business Process Modeling-Benefits and Capability, In AAAI 2008 Stanford Spring Symposium, Stanford University, California.

Google Scholar

[2] Business Rules Group, Defining business rules, what they really are, July (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] I. Weber, J. Hoffmann, and J. Mendling. Semantic business process validation, Technical report, University of Innsbruck, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] W3C, SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, http: /www. w3. org/Submission/SWRL, Latest version: May (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] G. Koliadis and A. Ghose. Verifying Semantic Business Process Models in Inter-operation, In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, 2007, p.731–738.

DOI: 10.1109/scc.2007.128

Google Scholar

[6] C. Ghidini, M. Rospocher, L. Serafini, P. Tonella. Reasoning on semantically annotated processes, In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Service Oriented Computing, 2008, p.132–146.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89652-4_13

Google Scholar