The Identification of Neurons Research

Article Preview

Abstract:

In view of the present medical neurons characteristic cognition and human brain plan in the neurons of the limitation of recognition, this paper puts forward the neurons identification method. First the L - Measure software to neuron geometry feature extraction, and then to extract high dimensional feature through the principal component analysis dimension reduction processing. Combined classifier with pyramidal neurons, general Ken wild neurons, motor neuron, sensory neurons, double neurons, level 3 neurons and multistage neurons 7 kinds of neurons are classified. Experimental results prove that the probabilistic neural network, the BP neural network, fuzzy classifier composed of classifier recognition effect is superior to the arbitrary single classifier.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 756-759)

Pages:

2813-2818

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Human brain project – International neurionformatics research program[J]. Joumal of modem clinical medical, 2001, 7(5): 389-390.

Google Scholar

[2] Jin K, Mao XO, Sun Y, et al. Stem cell factor stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo[J]. J C lin Invest, 2002, 110(3): 311-319.

DOI: 10.1172/jci0215251

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang SC, Fedoroff S. Expression of stem cell factor and ckit receptor in neural cells after brain injury [J]. A ctaNeuropathol (Berl), 1999, 97(4): 393-398.

DOI: 10.1007/s004010051003

Google Scholar

[4] Ruggero Scorcioni, Sridevi Polavaram, Giorgio A Ascoli. L-Measure: a web-accessible tool for the analysis, comparison and search of digital reconstructions of neuronal morphologies. Nature Protocols 3, 2008: 866 - 876.

DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.51

Google Scholar

[5] http: /neuromorpho. org/neuroMorpho/index. jsp.

Google Scholar

[6] LUO Zhi-zeng, ZHAO Peng-fei. Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis for Feature Extraction of SEMG. Chinese journal of sensors and actuators, 2007, 20(10): 2164-2168.

Google Scholar

[7] SUN Jixiang. Modern Pattern Recognition[M]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press. 2002: 285-288.

Google Scholar

[8] Specht D. Probabilistic neural network[J]. Neural Networks, 1990, 3(1): 109-118.

Google Scholar

[9] McDuff R J, Simpson P K. An Investigation of Neural Networks for F-16 Fault Dignosis: II. System Performance[A]. SPIE 1294 Application of Artificial Neural Networks[C]. 1990: 42-45.

Google Scholar

[10] Liu Nangeng. Pattern recognition of SEMG based on prosthesis. A Dissertation to Shanghai Jiao Tong University for the Degree of Master. 2008:31-35.

Google Scholar

[11] EriguiⅡ, Krishnaparam R, Clustering by Competitive Agglomeration[J]. Pattern Recognition, 1997, 30(7): 1109-1119.

Google Scholar

[12] Avidan S. 2005. Ensemble tracking. Proc. CVPR, 494-501.

Google Scholar

[13] Grabner H, GRABNER M, Bischof H. 2006b. Real-time tracking via on-line boosting. Proc. British Machine Vision Conference, 27-36.

DOI: 10.5244/c.20.6

Google Scholar

[14] Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. 2003. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. Springer.

Google Scholar

[15] Huang C, Ai H, Li Y, et al. 2007. High-performance rotation invariant multiview face detection. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 29(4):671-686.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2007.1011

Google Scholar