Multi-Objective Optimization of Quality in Laser Cutting Based on Response Surface Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

Prediction and optimization of quality characteristics is an important means to improve the quality of laser cutting. Kerf width (KW) and material removal rate (MRR) are selected as the quality characteristics in this paper. The fitting response surface models (RSM) of KW and MRR are considered as the optimization objective function in pulsed Nd: YAG laser cutting of alloy steel for multi-objective optimization. An improved Pareto genetic algorithm is used in the optimization, and the significant factors have been found. The predicted results are basically consistent with the experimental. Therefore, the method used in this paper can be used for optimization of KW and MRR in pulse Nd: YAG laser cutting. The study can provide theoretical basis for the prediction and optimization of quality in laser cutting.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 756-759)

Pages:

3712-3716

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Shanjin LV, Yang Wang. An investigation of pulsed laser cutting of titanium alloy sheet. Opt Lasers Eng 2006; 44: 1067–77.

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.09.003

Google Scholar

[2] Tsai Chuwan-Huei, Chen Hong-Wen. Laser cutting of thick ceramic substrates by controlled fracture technique. J Mater Process Technol 2003; 136: 166–73.

Google Scholar

[3] Yilbas BS, Rashid M. CO2 laser cutting of incoloy 800HT alloy and its quality assessment. Lasers Eng 2002; 12: 135–45.

DOI: 10.1080/0898150021000014092

Google Scholar

[4] Almeida IA, de Rossi W, Lima MSF, Berretta JR, Ngueira GEC, Wetter NU, et al. Optimization of titanium cutting by factorial analysis of pulsed Nd: YAG laser parameters. J Mater Process Technol 2006; 179: 105–10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.107

Google Scholar

[5] Yilbas BS, Hyder SJ, Sunar M. The Taguchi method for determining CO2 laser cut quality. J LaserAppl 1998; 10(2): 71–7.

DOI: 10.2351/1.521823

Google Scholar

[6] Dubey AK, Yadava V. Robust parameter design and multi-objective optimiza- tion of laser beam cutting for aluminium alloy sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2008; 38: 268–77.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1105-x

Google Scholar

[7] Ghany AK, Newishy M. Cutting of 1. 2mm thick austenitic stainless steel sheet using pulsed and CW Nd: YAG laser. Journal of Material Processing Technology 2005; 168: 438–47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.251

Google Scholar

[8] Thawari G, Sarin Sundar JK, Sundararajan G, Joshi SV. Influence of process parameters during pulsed ND: YAG laser cutting of nickel-base superalloys. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2005; 170: 229–39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.021

Google Scholar

[9] Pradhan MK, Biswas CK. Neuro-fuzzy model and regression model a compar- ison study of MRR in electrical discharge machining of D2 tool steel. Int J Math Phys Eng Sci 2009; 3: 48–53.

Google Scholar

[10] Sivarao, Brevern P, Tayeb NSM, Vengkatesh VC. Modeling, testing and experimental validation of laser machining micro quality response by artificial neural network. Int J Eng Technol 2009; 09: 161–6.

DOI: 10.5772/8612

Google Scholar

[11] Syn CZ, Mokhtar M, Feng CJ, Manurung HPYupiter. Approach to prediction of laser cutting quality by employing fuzzy expert system. Expert Syst Appl 2011; 38: 7558–68.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.111

Google Scholar

[12] WANG Xiao-peng. Pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization design. Systems Engineering and Electronics. Systems Engineering and Electronics 25(12) (2003), 1558-1561.

Google Scholar

[13] H-J. Hao, J-Y. Xu,J. Li. Prediction of Laser Cutting Quality Based on Improved Pareto Genetic Algorithm. Lasers in Eng., 0: 1–14.

Google Scholar