Flow Field of XCP Probe's Head and Optimization Choice of Structural Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, numerical simulation of XCP probe was executed. The 3D Navier-Stokes equations were used as governing equations, and the finite volume method combining two-equations turbulence model was applied. The flow field of XCP Probe was analyzed, especially around the XCP Probe's head. The results show that the arc design of the XCP Probe's head plays an important role on the steady falling speed. In addition, when the radian is 27°, the resistance of the probe is smallest and a larger falling speed can be achieved; The electrodes of probe should be located in front end of a conduit which is in the middle of the probe.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 760-762)

Pages:

1753-1757

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Sun Tao, Huang Yin shui, Tao Jianhua. Numerical Modeling for the Kinetic Property of a Dropping Seawater Temperature-Salinity Probe and Experimental Verification[J]. Marine science Bulletin, 2002(4): 69-76.

Google Scholar

[2] Huang Yin shui, Tao Jianhua. Computation Method of the Kinetic Property of Salinity, Temperature and Depth Probe with Releasing Winding[J]. Journal of Ocean Technology, 2003(3): 45-48.

Google Scholar

[3] Xiao Hong, Liu Chang gen, Tao Jian hua. Numerical Simulation of Drag Coefficient for CTD Probes and its Experimental Verification[J]. Journal of Ocean Technology, 2006, 25(1): 35-37.

Google Scholar

[4] LIU Ning, HE Hong-kun. Study on the theory of expendable current profiler measurement[J]. Journal of Ocean Technology, 2010, 29(1): 8-11.

Google Scholar

[5] Liu Yao, Liu Zhizhu. Numerical Simulation of Flow Field for Underwater Vehicle During Empennage-Expanding [J]. Journal of Mechanics in Engineering, 2006, 28(4): 21-22.

Google Scholar

[6] Shoichi Kizu, Hiroji Onishi, Toshio Suga, Kimio Hanawa. Evaluation of the fall rates of the present and developmental XCTDs [J]. Deep-sea Research I, 2008(55): 583.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2007.12.011

Google Scholar

[7] T. B. Sanford, R. G. Drever, J. H. Dunlap. A Velocity Profiler Based on the Principles of Geomagnetic Induction [J]. Deep Sea Research, Vol. 25, 1978, pp.183-210.

DOI: 10.1016/0146-6291(78)90006-1

Google Scholar

[8] Spain, P., and T. B. Sanford. Accurately monitoring the Florida Current with motion-induced voltages [J]. Mar. Res., 1987, 7, 843–870.

DOI: 10.1357/002224087788327154

Google Scholar

[9] R. R. Harvey, J. C. Larsen, R. Montaner, Electric Field Recording of Tidal Currents n the Strait of Magellan [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 82, No. 24, August (1977).

DOI: 10.1029/jc082i024p03472

Google Scholar

[10] Boening, C. W., F. O. Bryan, W. R. Holland, and R. Doescher, Deep-water formation and meridional overturning in a high-resolution model of the North Atlantic [J]. Phys. Oceanogr., 1996, 26, 1142–1164.

DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026<1142:dwfamo>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[11] Bryan, F. O., and W. R. Holland, A high resolution simulation of the wind and thermohaline circulation in the North Atlantic Ocean [C]. Proceedings of Aha Huliko, a Hawaiian Workshop, Hawaii Institute of Geophysics, 1989, 99–115.

Google Scholar