Harmony Search Optimization Algorithm Based on Normal Cloud

Article Preview

Abstract:

The pitch adjusting rate (PAR) is an important parameter in harmony search algorithm, which indicates that the algorithm will choose a neighboring value with a probability. The traditional harmony search algorithm uses fixed value for PAR. However, PAR should be increased when all objective values are centralized and decreased when the function values are scattered in the solution space. In this paper, a new cloud harmony search algorithm (CHS) is proposed. We introduce cloud model theory to adjust the value PAR in the harmony search to improve the global search ability and make faster convergence speed of the algorithm. The improved harmony search algorithm is tested on some benchmark functions and the results are compared with the result of the traditional harmony search. Experimental results indicate that the improved harmony search algorithm has a good performance in the global search ability and convergent speed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 760-762)

Pages:

1825-1830

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z. W. Geem, J. H. Kim and G. V. Loganathan, A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search, Simulation, vol. 76, no. 2, pp.60-68, (2001).

DOI: 10.1177/003754970107600201

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Kong, L.Q. Gao, L.F. Wang, and Y.F. Ge, On Adaptive Harnony Search Algorithm, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 5, no. 9, pp.2551-2560, (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Mahdavi, M. Fesanghary and E. Damangir, An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problem, Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 188, pp.1567-1579, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.11.033

Google Scholar

[4] Mark J. Harris, William V. Baxter III, Thorsten Scheuermann, Anselmo Lastra, Thrsten Scheuermann. Simulation of Cloud Dynamics on Graphics Hardware,. Graphics Hardware (2003).

DOI: 10.1145/1198555.1198793

Google Scholar

[5] D.Y. Li, Uncertainty reasoning based on cloud models in controllers, Computer science and Mathematics with Application, vol. 35, no. 3, pp.99-123, (1998).

Google Scholar

[6] J. Zhoa, J. SUN, and W. Xu. Quantum-behaved Particle Swarm Optimization with Normal Cloud Mutation Operator, Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, 2009 Wuhan, pp.1-4.

DOI: 10.1109/cise.2009.5364714

Google Scholar

[7] G. Yan, and Z. Hao. A Novel A tmosphere Clouds Model Optimization Algorithm, International Conference on Computing, Measurement, Control and Sensor Network. 2012, Taiyuan, pp.217-220.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Wen and B. Cao. A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer Based on Cloud Model, " Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics July, 2008, Xi, an, China, pp, 1238-1241.

DOI: 10.1109/aim.2008.4601839

Google Scholar

[9] J. Wen, X. Wu, K. Jiang and B. Cao, Particle Swarm Algorithm Based on Normal Cloud, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Hangkong, China, pp.1492-1496.

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2008.4630990

Google Scholar

[10] C. Dai, Y. Zhu, W. Chen, Cloud Theory-Based Genetic Algorithm, Journal of Southwest Jiao Tong University, 2006, 41(6), pp.729-732.

Google Scholar

[11] Li D.; Meng H.; Shi X. Membership Clouds and Membership Cloud Generators, [J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 1995, 32 (6), pp.15-20.

Google Scholar