Heterogeneous Communication Architecture to Enable Demand Response Management for the Smart Grid

Article Preview

Abstract:

Demand response entails the control of the energy demand and loads during critical peak situations to achieve a balance between electrical energy supply and demand. A robust communication infrastructure, which consists of network components of Home Area Networks (HANs) and Neighborhood Area Networks (NANs) is the touchstone to achieve the demand response goals. This paper surveys existing communication technologies that can be adopted for demand response applications. A heterogeneous communication architecture based on Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and Ethernet Passive Optical Networks (EPONs) is presented, and the reliability and scalability requirements of communication system is satisfied.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 760-762)

Pages:

652-655

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.H. Katz, D.E. Culler, S. Sanders, S. Alspaugh, Y. Chen, S. Dawson Haggerty, P. Dutta, M. He, X. Jiang, L. Keys, A. Krioukov, K. Lutz, J. Ortiz, P. Mohan, E. Reutzel, J. Taneja, J. Hsu, S. Shankar: An information-centric energy infrastructure: the berkeley view, Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems. Vol. 1 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.suscom.2010.10.001

Google Scholar

[2] X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, D. Yang: Smart grid – the new and improved power grid: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials. Vol. 14 (2011), pp.944-980.

DOI: 10.1109/surv.2011.101911.00087

Google Scholar

[3] Wenye Wang, Yi Xu, Mohit Khanna: A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid. Computer Networks. Vol. 55 (2011), p.3604–3629.

DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2011.07.010

Google Scholar

[4] Rong Yu, Yan Zhang, Stein Gjessing, Chau Yuen, Chau Yuen, Mohsen Guizani: Cognitive radio based hierarchical communications infrastructure for smart grid. IEEE Network, Vol. (2011), pp.6-14.

DOI: 10.1109/mnet.2011.6033030

Google Scholar

[5] N. Saputro et al., A survey of routing protocols for smart grid communications, Computer Networks, Vol. 56, (2012), p.2742–2771.

DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.03.027

Google Scholar

[6] Reduan H. Khan, Jamil Y. Khan: A comprehensive review of the application characteristics and traffic requirements of a smart grid communications network. Computer Networks, Vol. 57 (2013), p.825–845.

DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.11.002

Google Scholar

[7] V. Cagri Gungor, Dilan Sahin, Taskin Kocak, Salih Ergut, Concettina Buccella, Carlo Cecati, and Gerhard P. Hancke: A Survey on Smart Grid Potential Applications and Communication Requirements. IEEE Trans. On Industrial Informatics, Vol. 9, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/tii.2012.2218253

Google Scholar

[8] Hiroaki Mukai, Yoshifumi Hotta, Tetsuya Yokotani, Akira Takahashi, Kiyoshi Shimokasa: PON with automatic protection switching for high reliable communication. Optical Switching and Networking, Vol. 6 (2009), pp.163-170.

DOI: 10.1016/j.osn.2009.04.002

Google Scholar