Comparative Study of the Hydrodynamic Performance of Shorter and Longer Blades in a Swirling Fluidized Bed

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fluidized beds have been widely used in industrial processes. The inefficiency of current systems provides opportunities for improvement and development of new fluidized bed techniques. The swirling fluidized bed is an outcome of such a quest. The main shortcomings of present day SFB systems are the underutilization of available annular area and massing of bed particles at the periphery of the bed column. In this work the authors report the effect of increasing the annular area in a Swirling Fluidized Bed (SFB) by using longer blades for the distributor and compare it to the conventional blade length of 50 mm. Distributor blades of two different lengths, 50 mm and 100 mm, was used in this work and the bed height was measured with spherical bed particle of three different sizes (4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm) at varying bed weight and superficial velocity. For a given bed weight, the benefits are achieved through a lower bed pressure drop as well as better quality of fluidization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

560-565

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V. Vojtěch, M. Miroslav and D. Radek, Fluidized Bed Drying, Leonard Hill, London (1966).

Google Scholar

[2] C. K. Gupta and D. Sathiyamoorthy, Fluid Bed Technology in Materials Processing, CRC Press LLC., London (1999).

Google Scholar

[3] J.R. Howard, Fluidized bed technology: Principles and applications, Adam Hilger Publication, Bristol, U.K. (1989).

Google Scholar

[4] R. Kaewklum and V. I. Kuprianov, Fuel, 89, 43–52 (2010).

Google Scholar

[5] B. Sreenivasan, V. R. Raghavan, Chemical Engineering and Processing , 41, 99-106 (2002).

Google Scholar

[6] F. Ouyang and O. Levenspiel, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 25, 504 (1986).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Ergun, Chemical Engineering Progress, 48, 89-94(1952).

Google Scholar

[8] M. F. Mohideen, B. Sreenivasan, S. A. Sulaiman and V. R. Raghavan, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(7), 862-867 (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] V. Vinod Kumar, M. F. Batcha and V. R. Raghavan, Engineering e-Transaction (ISSN 1823-6379), 6(1), 70-75 (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] V. K. Venkiteswaran, G. J. Jun, C.Y. Sing, S. A. Sulaiman and V. R. Raghavan, Journal of Applied Sciences, 12, 2598-2603 (2012).

Google Scholar