An EEG Investigation of the Impact of Noise on Attention

Article Preview

Abstract:

During the past two decades, most researchers employed a questionnaire to characterize the effect of noise on psychosomatic responses. Developments in physiological techniques offer a non-invasive method for recording brain activity with electroencephalography (EEG). This method for assessing the impact of noise on attention is growing in popularity. The aim of this study was to investigate brain activity changes in response to noise exposure during attention-demanding tasks by using EEG power and phase coherence estimation. We hypothesized that brain rhythms could be affected by environmental stimuli and would be reflected in the EEG power and phase coherence. Nineteen healthy right-handed university students (mean age = 21.5 ± 2.0 years) participated in this study. The experiment comprised recording EEG data for participants in the following steps: rest with eyes closed (< 50 dBA), rest with eyes open, listening in a noisy environment (85 dBA), performance on an attention-demanding task in a quiet environment (< 50 dBA), and performance on an attention-demanding task in a noisy environment (85 dBA). Significant differences were observed between stages, and the participants performed more effectively in the quiet environment, where they showed higher rates of correct responses (p <.05). From the assessment of the EEG power and phase coherence estimation, the study demonstrated the following: (1) Alpha-2 (10-13 Hz) power and phase coherence decreased when participants shifted from closed eyes to open eyes, while theta power increased. (2) In contrast, during the noise exposure phase, whether during an attention-demanding task or not, beta (13-30 Hz) phase coherence decreased in the brain, but theta phase coherence was not affected compared to the results in the quiet environment. We suggest that the high frequency of neural synchronization is relevant for cognitive performance, and that participants at risk for selective attention are affected by noise exposure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 779-780)

Pages:

1731-1736

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.I. Nelson, R.Y. Nelson, M. Concha‐Barrientos, M. Fingerhut: The global burden of occupational noise‐induced hearing loss, Am. J. Ind. Med. 48 (2005), 446-458.

DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20223

Google Scholar

[2] W. Passchier-Vermeer, W.F. Passchier: Noise exposure and public health, Environ. Health Perspect. 108 (2000), 123.

DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108s1123

Google Scholar

[3] B. Langguth: A review of tinnitus symptoms beyond'ringing in the ears': a call to action, Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 27 (2011), 1635-1643.

DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2011.595781

Google Scholar

[4] J. Zhou, D. Liu, X. Li, J. Ma, J. Zhang, J. Fang: Pink noise: effect on complexity synchronization of brain activity and sleep consolidation, J. Theor. Biol. 306 (2012), 68-72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.006

Google Scholar

[5] S. Manikandan, M.K. Padma, R. Srikumar, N. Jeya Parthasarathy, A. Muthuvel, R.S. Devi: Effects of chronic noise stress on spatial memory of rats in relation to neuronal dendritic alteration and free radical-imbalance in hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex, Neurosci. Lett. 399 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.01.037

Google Scholar

[6] S.A. Stansfeld, B. Berglund, C. Clark, I. Lopez-Barrio, P. Fischer, E. Öhrström, M.M. Haines, J. Head, S. Hygge, I. van Kamp: Aircraft and road traffic noise and children's cognition and health: a cross-national study, The Lancet 365 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66660-3

Google Scholar

[7] S.L. Uran, M.L. Aon-Bertolino, L.G. Caceres, F. Capani, L.R. Guelman: Rat hippocampal alterations could underlie behavioral abnormalities induced by exposure to moderate noise levels, Brain Res. 1471 (2012), 1-12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.06.022

Google Scholar

[8] J.P. Lachaux, E. Rodriguez, J. Martinerie, F.J. Varela: Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals, Hum. Brain Mapp. 8 (1999), 194-208.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::aid-hbm4>3.0.co;2-c

Google Scholar

[9] O. Jensen, J. Kaiser, J. Lachaux: Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory, Trends Neurosci. 30 (2007), 317-324.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.001

Google Scholar

[10] F. Mormann, K. Lehnertz, P. David: Mean phase coherence as a measure for phase synchronization and its application to the EEG of epilepsy patients, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 144 (2000), 358-369.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2789(00)00087-7

Google Scholar

[11] B. Cui, M. Wu, X. She, H. Liu: Impulse noise exposure in rats causes cognitive deficits and changes in hippocampal neurotransmitter signaling and tau phosphorylation, Brain Res. (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.08.035

Google Scholar

[12] G. Pfurtscheller, F. Lopes da Silva: Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles, Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999), 1842-1857.

DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8

Google Scholar

[13] C.M. Krause, P. Korpilahti, B. Pörn, J. Jäntti, H.A. Lang: Automatic auditory word perception as measured by 40 Hz EEG responses, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107 (1998), 84-87.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00030-3

Google Scholar

[14] F. Aoki, E. Fetz, L. Shupe, E. Lettich, G. Ojemann: Increased gamma-range activity in human sensorimotor cortex during performance of visuomotor tasks, Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999), 524-537.

DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00064-9

Google Scholar

[15] C. Stam, Y. Van der Made, Y. Pijnenburg, P. Scheltens: EEG synchronization in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease, Acta Neurol. Scand. 108 (2003), 90-96.

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.02067.x

Google Scholar