Research on Value Assessment System of Educational Cloud

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the era of cloud computing, cloud computing with mass storage sharing, rapid data processing and other advantages has been widely used in the field of education. The Educational cloud systems will play an important role in the development of education informatization. This paper selects educational cloud systems as the research subject, based on the status quo of educational cloud, and builds up a value assessment system to provide quantifiable and operational standards for the educational cloud systems, with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. This paper further proposes program and process recommendations for educational cloud systems in order to elevate its value and efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 785-786)

Pages:

1516-1520

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wheeler, Brad, Waggener, Shelton: Above-Campus Services: Shaping the Promise of Cloud Computing for Higher Education. EDUCAUSE Review. Vol. 44 (2009), P. 52.

Google Scholar

[2] Thomas L. Saaty: What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process?. Mathematical Models for Decision Support NATO ASI Series. Vol. 48 (1988), P. 109.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5

Google Scholar

[3] Thomas L. Saaty: How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 48 (1990), P. 9.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i

Google Scholar

[4] Thomas L. Saaty: Analytic Hierarchy Process. WILEY ONLINE LIBRARY. (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] Thomas L. Saaty: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. Vol. 1 (2008), P. 83.

Google Scholar

[6] Omkarprasad S. Vaidyaa, Sushil Kumarb: Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 169 (2006), P. 1.

Google Scholar