Analysis of Axial Local Flux Characteristics in Hollow-Fiber Membrane

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the characteristics of non-uniform distribution in the fouling of hollow-fiber membrane, the non-uniform distribution of local flux and redistribution with different fiber length (0.6 m、1.2 m、1.6 m) was investigated experimentally. Experiment was conducted under the condition of operating flux 20 L/m2h (20 LMH). The results indicated that the longer fiber length was, the greater difference in local pressure and the more non-uniform the local flux distributed. Under operating mode of critical flux, the flux distribution in the length of 1.6 m membrane fiber is the most non-uniform with the fastest fouling rate. In addition, the distribution of local flux is more uniform for 0.6 m fiber under the operating flux of 16 LMH, which also slow down membrane fouling significantly. Shorter membrane fiber generally exhibited higher uniformity in the local flux distribution and slower development rate of membrane fouling.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

413-417

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.H. Yoon, S. Lee, IK.T. Yeom, Experimental verification of pressure drop models inhollow-fiber membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 2 (2008) 7-12.

Google Scholar

[2] T. Carroll, N. A. Booker, Axial features in the fouling of hollow-fiber membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 168 (2000) 203-212.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Chang, A. G. Fane, The effect of fiber diameter on filtration and flux distribution relevance to submerged hollow-fiber modules, J. Membr. Sci., 184 (2001) 221-231.

DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(00)00626-8

Google Scholar

[4] S. Chang, A. G. Fane, Modeling and optimizing submerged hollow-fiber membrane modules, AIChE J., 10(2002) 2204-2212.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690481011

Google Scholar

[5] J. Kim, A. D. Francis, Defining critical flux in submerged membranes: Influence of length-distributed flux, J. Membr. Sci., 280 (2006) 752-761.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.02.040

Google Scholar

[6] J. Sargolzaei, M. H. Asl, Hedayati Moghaddam A., Membrane permeate flux and rejection factor prediction using intelligent systems, Desalination, 284 (2012) 92-99.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.041

Google Scholar

[7] K. Ch. Yu, The control mechanism research of gas-liquid two-phase flow in separation membrane bioreactor, Tsinghua University, (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Buetehorn, L. Utiu, M. Küppers, NMR imaging of local cumulative permeate flux and local cake growth in submerged microfiltration processes, J. Membr. Sci., 371 (2011) 52–64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.018

Google Scholar

[9] P. Bacchin, P. Aimar, R.W. Field, Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications, J. Membr. Sci., 281 (2006) 42-69.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.014

Google Scholar

[10] P. Sridang, N. Thongmak, S. Danteravanich, Stability of skim latex suspension and rubber content recovery by microfiltration process: operating conditions and fouling characteristics, Desal. Wat. Treat., 45 (2012) 70-78.

DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.692011

Google Scholar