Optimization of Ultrasonic-Assisted Regeneration Process for Coconut Shell Activated Carbon Based on Response Surface Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The single-factorial design of experiments and response surface methodology was applied to optimize ultrasonic-assisted regeneration of coconut shell activated carbon. With the pH values of the solution, solid-liquid ratio, irradiation time chosen as the independent variable and the activated carbon release of antimony as response values, the central composite design method was used to study each of the variables and their interactions on coconut shell activated carbon regeneration. The results of this study showed that: the optimum pH value was 13; solid-liquid ratio was 372 mL·g-1; irradiation time was 6.7 h. The average content of the release of Sb from the activated carbon was 6233.95 μg·g-1 under the optimum condition. Regeneration rate of the activated carbon was 84.45%. This demonstrated that the adsorption efficiency of Sb was close in regenerative carbon and the original carbon. The results proved that the ultrasonic-associated coconut shell activated carbon regeneration process was accurate and reliable, and can provide a reference for the regeneration of coconut shell activated carbon which had adsorbed Sb.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

450-455

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Navarro and F.J. Alguacil: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 66 (2002), p.101.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.S. Weng: water and wastewater engineering Vol. 30 (2004), p.86 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Zhang, G.M. Li, L. Chen, J.F. Zhao and Y.S. Chen: Chemical World Vol. 42 (2001), p.441 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] F.K. Yuen and B.H. Hameed: Advances in Colloid and Interface Science Vol. 149 (2009), p.19.

Google Scholar

[5] M.P. Cal, B.W. Strickler, A.A. Lizzio and S.K. Gangwal: Carbon Vol. 38 (2000), p.1767.

Google Scholar

[6] Hamdaoui, E. Naffrechoux, L. Tifouti and C. Pétrier: Ultrasonics Sonochemistry Vol. 10 (2003), p.109.

DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4177(02)00137-2

Google Scholar

[7] Y.R. Suo and Y.L. Huang: Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis Vol. 12 (1992), p.87 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] N. Aslan, Y. Cebeci: Fuel Vol. 86 (2007), p.90.

Google Scholar

[9] G. Vicente, A. Coteron, M. Martinez and J. Aracil: Industrial Crops and Products Vol. 8 (1998), p.29.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Apark, K. Guclu and M.H. Turguit: J Colloid Interface Sci. Vol. 203 (1998), p.122.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Shi, X.J. Peng, Z.K. Luan, N. Wei, Q. Wang and Y. Zhao: Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae Vol. 29 (2009), p.2282(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] M.Q. Jiang, X.Y. Jin, X.Q. Lu and Z.L. Chen: Desalination Vol. 252 (2010), p.33.

Google Scholar

[13] M.C. He, H.B. Ji and C.Y. Zhao: Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae Vol. 23 (2003), p.483 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] G.F. Wang, M.F. Bao and Z.Z. Han: Environmental Protection Science Vol. 30 (2004), p.26 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] A. Kumar, B. Prasad and I.M. Mishra: Chem. Eng. Technol. Vol. 30 (2007), p.932.

Google Scholar