Development of Stainless Steels in Nuclear Industry: With Emphasis on Sodium Cooled Fast Spectrum Reactors History, Technology and Foresight

Article Preview

Abstract:

Stainless steels (SS) have earned a unique position as a widely accepted class of alloys with track record of steadily improving the performance and increasing applications from 1913 till date. This distinction is attributed to R&D, innovations and applications leading to harnessing the rare combination of properties of stainless steels, since its discovery hundred years back. Though the initial discovery of stainless steel is basically serendipity, and based on previous work, its indispensable position today, in many a wide range of applications is due to intense R&D efforts in understanding its physical, chemical, thermal and thermo-mechanical response for various chemistries and microstructures. A deliberate attempt to extend its application spectrum through various routes of manufacturing in the last century is another crucial aspect of the success story. The first part of the presentation would briefly review this exciting journey of unravelling the mysteries of stainless steels.The second part of the presentation would highlight the evolution of stainless steels in the nuclear industry, especially for the sodium cooled fast reactors. Early 70s have seen the application of stainless steels in first generation water based nuclear power plants and AISI types 304 and 316 SS was recommended for structural and core applications in fast spectrum reactors (FSR). Failure of some of the components even in the manufacturing stage and quest for improving mechanical properties and sensitisation and intergranular corrosion resistances resulted in the development of 304L, 304LN, 316L, 316LN SS during 1980-90 for further applications in FSRs. Towards core applications in intense radiation environments, three generations of stainless steels namely 20% cold worked 316 SS, D9, and D9I have been developed to yield high burnup and to triple the lifetime of the core components of the fast reactors. Towards closing the fuel cycle, again 304L SS was the workhorse material which was upgraded with newer varieties like nitric acid grade alloys for improved corrosion resistance and longer life. Manufacturing of special grades of SS and the developments in fabrication technologies was necessary in order to enhance the performance of components and to avoid failures. Welding, inspection, quality assurance and structural integrity of various components of SS for FSRs and fuel cycle facilities resulted in developments in areas like modelling, devices, methodologies and analysis. An opportunity existed for the development and application of innovative non-destructive testing techniques for robust examination of critical components.Nuclear industry is embarking a state of the art fourth generation reactors. The consequent newer generation of SS are evolving with improved properties to match the expectations of performance in increased temperature, pressure, chemical and other physical constraints. It is of paramount importance to consider the extension of the lifetime of the current reactors from 40-60 to 60-80 years for economic considerations, and in this regard innovations are necessary in the development of newer varieties of stainless steels with respect to modelling and life prediction, manufacturing, fabrication, testing and evaluation. Thus the management approach to knit a network of industry-research-academia is a key approach for way forward. A development of roadmap for robust science based technology development with foresight is a desired management strategy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

[1] Information on http: //www. EngineeringToolBox. com/stainless_steel_classifications_d_ 368. html.

Google Scholar

[2] I. Alvarez-Armas, S. Degallaix-Moreuil, Duplex Stainless Steels, John Wiley & Sons Inc., NJ, (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/9781118557990

Google Scholar

[3] E. Perelome, D.V. Edmonds, Phase Transformations in Steels, Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering No 57, Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-85709-592-3.50026-4

Google Scholar

[4] 75 Years of Stainless Steel 1913-1988, British Steel Stainless, Shaffield, UK, (1988).

Google Scholar

[5] Pascal PAYET-GASPARD, Stainless steel a bright future in a changing world? BIR World Annual Conference, Rome, Italy, May (2012).

Google Scholar

[6] Stainless Steel in Figures 2013, International Stainless Steel Forum, Brussels, Belgium, (2013).

Google Scholar

[7] Baldev Raj, M. Vijayalakshmi, P.R. Vasudeva Rao, K. Bhanusankara Rao, Challenges in Materials Research for sustainable nuclear energy, MRS Bulletin: Energy issue, Harnessing Materials for Energy, (2008).

DOI: 10.1557/mrs2008.67

Google Scholar

[8] Baldev Raj, M. Vijayalakshmi, Design Principles of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Energy Encyclopedia, Steven Krivit, John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA, 2011, Chapter 13, pp.188-222.

Google Scholar

[9] Baldev Raj, Divakar Ramachandran, M. Vijayalakshmi, Development of Cladding Materials for Sodium Cooled Fast Reactors in India, Special Issue on High Performance Structural Materials, Trans. Ind. Inst. Met., 62(2) (2009) 89-94.

DOI: 10.1007/s12666-009-0012-2

Google Scholar

[14] C.N. Venketeswaran, P. Parameswaran, V. Anandraj, V. Karthik, N.G. Muralidharan, V. Venugopal, S. Saroja, M. Vijayalakshmi, K.V. Kasiviswanathan, Baldev Raj Characterisation of stainless steel wrapper from fast breeder test reactor, in: K. Bhanu Sankara Rao, T. Jayakumar, P.V. Sivaprasad, Saroja Saibaba and P. Shankar (Eds. ) Advances in Stainless Steels, Universities Press, Hyderabad, 2009, pp.59-66. S.L. Mannan, S.C. Chetal, Baldev Raj, S.B. Bhoje, Selection of materials for prototype fast breeder reactor, Trans. Indian Inst. Met, 56 (2003).

DOI: 10.1520/jai101991

Google Scholar

[15] M. Vijayalakshmi, P. Shankar, C. Sudha, Microstructural aspects and thermodynamic stability of nitrogen bearing stainless steel, in: U. Kamatchi Mudali, Baldev Raj (Eds. ) High nitrogen steels and stainless steels- Manufacturing, properties and applications, Monograph of the Proc. of Int. Conf. on High Nitrogen Steels, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 2004, pp.113-132.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.36.799

Google Scholar

[16] Baldev Raj, U. Kamachi Mudali, Prog. Nucl. Energy. 48 (2006) 283-313.

Google Scholar

[17] S. Ningshen, U. Kamachi Mudali, G. Amarendra, Baldev Raj, Corrosion assessment of nitric acid grade austenitic stainless steels, Corro. Sci., 51(2) (2009) 322–329.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.09.038

Google Scholar

[18] N. Parvathavarthini, U. Kamachi Mudali, L. Nenova, C. Andreev, Baldev Raj, Sensitization and intergranular corrosion behavior of high nitrogen type 304LN stainless steels for reprocessing and waste management applications, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 43 (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-011-1053-9

Google Scholar

[19] U. Kamachi Mudali, A. Ravi Shankar, S. Ningshen, Girija Suresh, Ravikumar Sole, K. Thyagarajan, Materials development and corrosion issues in the back end of fuel cycle, Energy Proc., 7 (2011) 468-473.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.06.064

Google Scholar

[20] Aritra Sarkar, A. Nagesha, P. Parameswaran, R. Sandhya, M.D. Mathew, Influence of dynamic strain ageing on the deformation behaviour during ratcheting of a 316LN stainless steel, Mater. Sci. Engg. 564 (2013) 359-368.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.115

Google Scholar

[21] S. Ravi, K. Laha, M.D. Mathew, S. Vijayaraghavan, M. Shanmugavel, K.K. Rajan, T. Jayakumar, A comparison of creep deformation and rupture behaviour of 316L(N) austenitic stainless steel in flowing sodium and in air, Proc. Engg. 55 (2013) 823-829.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.338

Google Scholar

[22] V.S. Srinivasan, M. Valsan, K. Bhanu Sankara Rao, S.L. Mannan, B. Raj, Low cycle fatigue and creep–fatigue interaction behavior of 316L(N) stainless steel and life prediction by artificial neural network approach, Inter. J. of Fatigue 25 (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(03)00064-1

Google Scholar

[23] C. Sudha, N. Sivai Bharasi, R. Anand, H. Shaikh, R.K. Dayal, M. Vijayalakshmi, Carburisation behaviour of AISI 316L(N) austenitic stainless steel: Experimental studies and modeling, J. Nucl. Mater. 402 (2010) 186-195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.023

Google Scholar

[24] T. Sakthivel, M. Vasudevan, K. Laha, P. Parameswaran, K.S. Chandravathi, M.D. Mathew, A.K. Bhaduri, Comparison of creep rupture behaviour of type 316L(N) austenitic stainless steel joints welded by TIG and activated TIG welding processes, Mater. Sci. Engg. A528 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.05.052

Google Scholar

[25] R.K. Dayal, N. Parvathavarthini, Baldev Raj, Int. Mater. Rev. 50 (2005) 129–55.

Google Scholar

[26] N. Parvathavarthini, R.K. Dayal, Influence of chemical composition, prior deformation and prolonged thermal aging on the sensitization characteristics of austenitic stainless steels, J. Nucl. Mater. 305(2–3) (2002) 209–219.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(02)00915-7

Google Scholar

[27] K.V. Kasivisvanathan, N.G. Muraleedharan, N. Raghu, R.K. Dayal, H. Shaikh, Corrosion related failures of austenitic stainless steel components, in: H.S. Khatak, Baldev Raj (Ed. ) Corrosion of austenitic SS—mechanism, mitigation and monitoring, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, (2002).

DOI: 10.1533/9780857094018.340

Google Scholar

[28] R.K. Dayal, J.B. Gnanamoorthy, N. Chandrasekharan, Failure of a stainless steels tank used for storage of heavy water/helium, in: K.A. Esaklul (Ed. ) ASM Handbook of Case Histories in Failure Analysis, , ASM International, 2, Materials Park, 1993, p.253.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.v02.c9001349

Google Scholar

[29] U. Kamachi Mudali, R.K. Dayal, J.B. Gnanamoorthy, P. Rodriguez, Pitting corrosion studies on nitrogen-bearing austenitic stainless steels, Mater. Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 37(10) (1996) 1568–1573.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1989.37.1568

Google Scholar

[30] U. Kamachi Mudali, S. Ningshen, Corrosion properties of nitrogen bearing stainless steels, in: U. Kamachi Mudali, Baldev Raj (Eds. ), High Nitrogen Steels and SS, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 2004, p.133–181.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.05.041

Google Scholar

[31] U. Kamachi Mudali, S. Ningshen, A.K. Tyagi and R.K. Dayal, Influence of metallurgical and chemical variables on pitting corrosion behaviour of nitrogen-bearing austenitic stainless steels, Mater. Sci. Forum 318-320 (1999) 495-502.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.318-320.495

Google Scholar

[32] U. Kamachi Mudali, R.K. Dayal, J.B. Gnanamoorthy, P. Rodriguez, Role of nitrogen in improving the passive film stability and pitting corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steels, Trans Ind. Inst. Met. 50(1) (1997) 37-47.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1989.37.1568

Google Scholar

[33] U. Kamachi Mudali, R.K. Dayal, J.B. Gnanamoorthy, P. Rodriguez, Relationship between pitting and intergranular corrosion of nitrogen-bearing austenitic stainless steels, ISIJ Inter. 36(7) (1996) 799 - 806.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.36.799

Google Scholar

[34] U. Kamachi Mudali, R.K. Dayal, J.B. Gnanamoorthy, P. Rodriguez, Influence of thermal aging on the intergranular corrosion resistance of types 304LN and 316LN stainless steels, Metal. Mater. Trans. A, 27(10) (1996) 2881-2887.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02663836

Google Scholar

[35] N. Parvathavarthini, R.K. Dayal, Time-temperature sensitization diagrams and critical cooling rates of different nitrogen containing austenitic stainless steels, J. Nucl. Mater. 399(1) (2010) 62–67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.01.003

Google Scholar

[36] R.S. Dutta, P.K. De, H.S. Gadiyar, The sensitisation and stress corrosion cracking of nitrogen containing stainless steels, Corro. Sci. 34 (1993) 51-60.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(93)90258-i

Google Scholar

[37] Angam Praveen, K. Vijayarekha, Saju T. Abraham, B. Venkataraman, Signal quality enhancement using higher order wavelets for ultrasonic TOFD signals from austenitic stainless steel welds, Ultrasonics 53 (2013) 1288-1292.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.03.013

Google Scholar