Temper Embrittlement and Corrosion Behaviour of Martensitic Stainless Steel 420

Article Preview

Abstract:

Tempering of alloy steels in the temperature range of 400-600 °C causes temper embrittlement i.e. decrease in notch toughness of the material and the nil ductility temperature is raised to room temperature and above. The fracture in temper-embrittled steel is intergranular and propagates along prior austenitic grain boundaries. The embrittlement occurs only in the presence of specific impurities, e.g. P, Sn, Sb and As. These elements have been shown to segregate along prior austenite grain boundaries during tempering. Similar type of temper embrittlement can occur in martensitic stainless steel (SS) if tempered in the temperature range of 450-600 °C. This paper reports a case of failure of components made from martensitic SS 420 due to temper embrittlement. These components were subjected to a temperature of 120 °C in the initial stages of service and had shown brittle fractures. Scanning electron microscopic examination of the fracture surface of both the components showed intergranular fracture. The microstructures of the failed components confirmed that the materials were in hardened and tempered condition. In addition, the microstructure revealed both intergranular corrosion (IGC) and intergranular cracking. The electron backscatter diffraction study also showed retained austenite in the first components material. The material undergoing IGC might be related to a wrong heat-treatment during fabrication and subsequent pickling procedures. To confirm this, a sample each from both the components was exposed to 5% nitric acid solution at 25 °C. The results showed very high corrosion rate and the attack was intergranular in nature. The failure of both the components was concluded to be due to wrong tempering treatment in the temperature range of 450-600 °C that cause grain boundaries to become susceptible to embrittlement and corrosion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

757-765

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.S. Choi, J.G. Kim, Y.S. Park, J.Y. Park, Austenitizing treatment influence on the electrochemical corrosion of 0. 3C-14Cr-3Mo martensitic stainless steel, Mater. Lett. 61 (2007) 244-247.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.04.041

Google Scholar

[2] S.K. Bhambri, Intergranular fracture in 13 wt% chromium martensitic stainless steel, J. Mater. Sci. 21 (1986) 1741-1746.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01114734

Google Scholar

[3] G.V. Prabhu Gaunkar, A.M. Huntz, P. Lacombe, Role of carbon in embrittlement phenomena of tempered martensitic 12 Cr-0. 15% C steel, Met. Sci. (1980) 241-252.

DOI: 10.1179/030634580790426427

Google Scholar

[4] A.N. Isfahany, H. Saghafian, G. Borhani, The effect of heat treatment on mechanical properties and corrosion behaviour of AISI420 martensitic stainless steel, J. Alloy Compd. 509 (2011) 3931-3936.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.174

Google Scholar

[5] G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy SI Metric ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, Singapore, (1988).

Google Scholar

[6] C.L. Briant, S.K. Banerji, Intergranular failure in steel: the role of grain boundary composition, Inter. Met. Rev. (1978) 164-199.

DOI: 10.1179/imr.1978.23.1.164

Google Scholar

[7] J.H. Park, O.K. Chopra, K. Natesan, W.J. Shack, Boric acid corrosion of light water reactor pressure vessel materials, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Cihal, Intergranular Corrosion of Steels and Alloys, Elsevier Science Publishin Company, (1984).

Google Scholar

[9] N. Alonso-Falleiros, M. Magri, I.G.S. Falleiros, Intergranular corrosion in a martensitic stainless steel detected by electrochemical tests, Corrosion 55 (1999) 769-778.

DOI: 10.5006/1.3284032

Google Scholar

[10] S. K. Chaudhury, R. Brook, Influence of prior-austenite grain size and fracture mode on the fracture toughness of 12% Cr steel, Inter. J. Fract. 12 (1976) 101-106.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00036013

Google Scholar