Difference Analysis of the Organic Acids Content of the Different Leaf Position in Flue-Cured Tobacco

Article Preview

Abstract:

The pre-treatment of sulfuric acid methyl ester with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis techniques was utilized to study the difference of the organic acid content in different flue-cured tobacco leaf (L8-L12): from the bottom of the eighth leave up to the twelfth leave) and its influence on flu-cured tobacco quality. The results show that malic acid, γ-e ketone acid, citric acid, malonic acid, linolenic acid and palmitic acid had a higher content relatively in different flue-cured tobacco leaves and they are the main acidic components.The difference of total organic acids content from the eighth to the twelfth leave was L8>L9>L12 >L10>L11; The content proportion ranges of non-volatile acid, senior saturated fatty acid and senior unsaturated fatty acid in total organic acids were 88.49%~94.38%,3.01%~5.10% and 2.61%~6.40%, respectively. The difference analysis of organic acids content in different leaf position indicated that the organic acids content in the eighth and twelfth leaves was moderate and they could be considered as the superior and slap-up tobacco raw materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

139-142

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Writing group of tobacco chemistry and analysis. Tobacco Chemistry and Analysis[M]. Beijing: China financial and economic publishing house. (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] WANG Rui-Xin, Tobacco Chemistry[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] Smeeton B W, Genetic control of tobacco quality [J]. Rec Tob Sic, 1987, 13: 3-27.

Google Scholar

[4] Kallianos A G, Phenolics and acids in leaf and their relationship to smoking quality and aroma [J]. Rec Adv Tob Sic, 1976, 2: 61-79.

Google Scholar

[5] Shi Hong-zhi, LIU Guo-shun, Tobacco Fragrance[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. 2000: 31.

Google Scholar

[6] D Layten, Davis Mark, T Nielsen, Tobacco-Production, chemistry and technology[M]. Science teaching department of national tobacco monopoly bureau and science information central organization of national tobacco , Translation . Beijing: Chemical Industry Press. (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] Wu Xue-ping, LIU Guo-shun, ZHU Kai, The effect of tobacco physiological character and chemistry component by using organic acids[J] . Acta Tabacaria Sinica , 2003, 9(2): 23-27.

Google Scholar

[8] Wu Xue-ping, LIU Guo-shun, PENG Wei-hua, Effects of Combined Application Different Ratio of Organic Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer on Organic Acids of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica. 2003, 18(1): 97-99.

Google Scholar

[9] PANG Rong-li, JIE Xiao-lei, TAN Jin-fang, The Influence of Low-molecular-weight Organic Acids on Phosphorus P Release from Synthesized Phosphates[J]. Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 2006(1): 64-67.

Google Scholar

[10] CHENG Chang-xin, LU Xiu-ping, XU Zi-cheng, Efects of Genotype and Ecological factors on Content of Aroma Components of Tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 2005, 21(II): 137-139.

Google Scholar

[11] LI Yan-qiang, HU You-chi, ZONG Yong-li, Changes of Volatile , Semi2Volatile Fatty Acids and pH of Yunnan Flue2Cured Tobacco during Aging[J]. Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics. 2004(3): 21-24.

Google Scholar