Effect of SiC Nanoparticles Content and Milling Time on the Characteristics of Al/SiC Nanocomposite Powders Produced via Mechanical Milling

Abstract:

In the present study high energy ball milling was utilized to produce aluminum (Al-6061) matrix nanocomposite powders reinforced with nanosilicon carbide (SiC) particles. The starting materials containing different percentages (1,3 or 5 wt.%) of nanoSiC particles (25-50 nm) and Al (38-63 μm) were co-milled for different times (16, 20, 24 h) to achieve nanocomposite powders. The crystal size of powders were evaluated by quantitative XRD analysis. Laser particle size analysis was used to evaluate the size of powders during milling. The microstructure of powders and their microhardness values were evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and a microhardness tester respectively. The results indicated that the crystal size of the matrix alloy decreased by milling time. The increased SiC content up to 3% resulted in increased microhardness of the powders. However, further increase of SiC to 5% resulted in decreased microhardness due to agglomeration. It was concluded that the maximum microhardness together with a uniform distribution of SiC particles within the matrix alloy was obtained after 20 h milling of powder mixture containing 3% of SiC nanoparticles.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 829)
• Pages: 505-509
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.829.505
• Online since: November 2013
• Authors: Farshad Akhlaghi*, Sareh Mosleh-Shirazi
• Keywords: AA6061 Aluminum Alloy, Mechanical Milling, Microhardness, Milling Time, Nanocomposite, SiC Nanoparticles

References

[1] C. Suryanarayana, N. Al-Aqeeli, Mechanically alloyed nanocomposites, Prog. Mater. Sci. 58 (2013) 383–502.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.10.001

[2] M. Moazami-Gudarzi, F. Akhlaghi, Effect of nanosized SiC particles addition to CP Al and Al-Mg powders on their compaction behavior, Powder Tech. 245 (2013) 126-133.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.025

[3] M. Rosso, Ceramic and metal matrix composites: Routes and properties, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 175 (2006) 364–375.

[4] M.A. Meyers, A. Mishra, D.J. Benson, Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials, Prog. Mater. Sci. 51 (2006) 427–556.

[5] C.C. Koch, R.O. Scattergood, K.L. Murty, The mechanical behavior of multiphase nanocrystalline materials, J. Mater. Sci. 59 (2007) 66–70.

DOI: 10.1007/s11837-007-0042-3

[6] S. Mula, P. Padhi, S.C. Panigrahi, S.K. Pabi, S. Ghosh, On structure and mechanical properties of ultrasonically cast Al–2% Al2O3 nanocomposite, Mater. Res. Bull. 44 (2009) 1154–1160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.09.040

[7] F. Akhlaghi, A. Lajevardi, H.M. Maghanaki, Effects of Casting temperature on the Microstructure and wear resistance of compocast A356/SiCp composites: a comparison between SS and SL routes, J. Mater. Proc. Tech. 155-156 (2004) 1874-1880.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.328

[8] J.B. Fogagnolo, Elisa M. Ruiz-Navas, Maria H. Robert , Jose M. Torralb, The effects of mechanical alloying on the compressibility of aluminium matrix composite powder, Mater. Sci. Eng. A355 (2003) 50-55.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(03)00057-1

[9] Y.Q. Liu, H.T. Cong, W. Wang, H.M. Cheng, AlN nanoparticle-reinforced nanocrystalline Al matrx composites: fabrication and mechanical properties, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 505 (2009) 151–156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.045

[10] M. Khakbiz, F. Akhlaghi, Synthesis and structural characterization of Al-B4C nanocomposite powders by mechanical alloying, J. Alloy Comp. 479 (2009) 334-341.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.12.076

[11] Z. Zhang, F. Zhou, E.J. Lavernia, On the analysis of grain size in bulk nanocrystalline materials via x-ray diffraction, Metall. Mater. Trans. 34A (2003) 1349–1355.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-003-0246-2