An Investigation on Machining Power of EN-AC 48000 Aluminum Alloy Used in Automotive and Aerospace Industries

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the effect of machining parameters including cutting velocity, feed rate, and tool material on machining power of EN-AC 48000 aluminium alloy has been studied. A L27 Taguchi's standard orthogonal array has been applied as experimental design to investigate the effect of the factors and their interaction. Twenty seven machining tests have been accomplished with two random repetitions, resulting in fifty four experiments. EN-AC 48000 is an important alloy in automotive and aerospace industries. Machining of this alloy is of vital importance due to build-up edge and tool wear. Machining power is an essential parameter affecting the tool life, dimensional accuracy, and cutting efficiency. Three types of cutting tools including coated carbide (CD 1810), uncoated carbide (H10), and polycrystalline diamond (CD10) have been used in this study. Statistical analysis has been employed to study the effect of factors and their interactions using ANOVA analysis. Moreover, optimal factor levels have been presented using signal to noise ratio (S/N) analysis. Also, regression model have been provided to predict the machining power. Finally, the results of confirmation tests have been presented to verify and compare the adequacy of the predictive models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 83-86)

Pages:

704-710

Citation:

Online since:

December 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Maleki , B. Niroumand, A. shafyei : Int. J. Mater Science and Engineering Vol 209 (2008), pp.3790-3797.

Google Scholar

[2] J. P. Davim: Journal of Mater Processing Technology, Vol 132, (2002), pp.340-344.

Google Scholar

[3] P. J. Heath : Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol 116, (2001), pp.31-38.

Google Scholar

[4] J. P. Davim: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol 128, (2002), pp.100-105.

Google Scholar

[5] J. P. Davim, M. Baptista: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol 103, (2000), pp.417-423.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Durante, G. Rutelli, F. Rabezzana: Journal of Surface and Coatings Technology, Vol 94-95 (1997), pp.632-640.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(97)00521-5

Google Scholar

[7] S. J. Haghi in: Modern Cutting Tools, Nashre Tarrah , Vol. 1 (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] R. Ranjitk in: Design of Experiment Using the Taguchi Approach, Wiley, New York, (2001).

Google Scholar

[9] M. S. Phadke in: Quality Engineering using Robust Design, Prentice Hall Int. Inc, (1989).

Google Scholar

[10] J.A. Ghani, I. A. Choudhhury, H. H. Hassan: Journal of Material Processing Technology , Vol. 145, (2004), pp.84-92.

Google Scholar

[11] R. S Pawade , S. S. Joshi, P. K. Brahmankar, M. Rahman: Journal of Material Processing Technology , Vol 192-193, (2007), pp.139-146.

Google Scholar

[12] G. Booth, W. A. Knight in: Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools, Mercel Dekker, Second edition , New York (1989).

Google Scholar

[13] Cutting Tools, Sandvik Coromant , Main catalogue, (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] G. Taguchi in : Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo (1990).

Google Scholar

[15] D.C. Montgomery in: Design and analysis of experiment , John Wiley & Sons Inc, (2000).

Google Scholar

[16] H. Kucuk in: Model Prediction of Cutting Forces for Aluminium Turning, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, (2001).

Google Scholar