Comparison of Wind Pressure Coefficients with Wind Load Provisions

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study has compared the equivalent external pressure coefficients, (GCpf)eq, with 6 wind load provisions and wind tunnel test data. The wind load provisions are the ASCE 7-10, NBCC 2010, AS/NZS 2011, EN 2005, AIJ 2004 and KBC 2009. Experiment data on low-rise building have been obtained at the University of Western Ontario (UWO) to contribute to the NIST aerodynamic database [. For the experiment, a model with 1:12 of roof slope and 4.9 and 12.2m of eave height was used under open terrain conditions (See also Ref. [). (GCpf)eq was re-normalized based on the external pressure coefficients, GCpf, of ASCE 7-10. When compared to (GCpf)eq of the experiment data with 4.9m of eave height, consequently, ASCE 7-10 (81%), NBCC 2010 (84%), AS/NZS 2011 (70%), AIJ 2004 (68%) and KBC 2009 (53%) were all underestimated. Among them, KBC 2009 reveals the lowest value. On the contrary, EN2005 was overestimated with 122%. When the eave height was 12.2m, in addition, the same pattern was observed in most codes. EN2005 was slightly overestimated with 115%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

124-128

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L.M.S. Pierre, G.A. Kopp, D. Surry, and T.C.E. Ho: The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part 2. Comparison of data with wind load provisions, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 93 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.007

Google Scholar

[2] T.C.E. Ho,D. Surry, D. Morrish, and G.A. Kopp: The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part 1. Archiving format and basic aerodynamic data, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 93 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.006

Google Scholar

[3] American Soiety of Civil Engineers (ASCE), ASCE Standard: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures: SEI-ASCE 7-10 (ASCE , Virginia 2010).

DOI: 10.1061/9780784412916.err

Google Scholar

[4] NRCC(National Research Council Canada): National Building Code of Canada 2010 Includes User's Guide- NBC 2010 Structural Commentaries (Part 4), (National Research Council of Canada, Canada 2010).

DOI: 10.4135/9781412972093.n343

Google Scholar

[5] Australian/New Zealand Standard: Australian/New Zealand Standard Structural design actions, Part 2: Wind actions-AS/NZS 1170. 2: 2011 (Standards Australia International Ltd., Standards New Zealand 2011).

DOI: 10.36334/modsim.2019.h8.magee

Google Scholar

[6] European Committee for Standardization (CEN)(EN): Eurocode1: Actions on Structures-Part 1–4: General actions-Wind ActionsEN1991-1-4: 2005 (CEN, Brussels 2005).

Google Scholar

[7] Architectural Institute of Japan: AIJ Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (2004Edition) (Architectural Institute of Japan, 2006).

Google Scholar

[8] Architectural Institute of Korea: Korean Building Code And Commentary 2009 (Architectural Institute of Korea, 2009).

Google Scholar