Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Push-Out Bond Strength of Zirconia Oxide Posts

Abstract:

To Investigate the Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Push-out Bond Strength of Zirconia Oxide Posts in Root Canals. Sixty Single Rooted Extracted Teeth were Collected and Divided into Two Groups. Custom Milled Zirconium Oxide Posts (Cercon, Degudent, Germany; Cosmopost, Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) were Fabricated. Post Specimens of each Group were Subjected to Different Surface Treatments (n=10): no Treatment (control), Sandblasting then Silane Coating and Silane Application (SB+SC+SI), Sandblasting and Silane Application (SB+SI). all Specimens were Bonded with Relyx Unicem and Horizontally Sectioned into Three Sections and Subjected to a Push-out Test. Data were Analyzed Using Two-way ANOVA. Cercon Recorded Significant Higher Bond Strength than Cosmopost (P＞0.05). Surface Treatments Recorded Higher Values than Control Group, and SB+SC+SI Presented Higher Bond Strength than SB+SI (P＞0.05). there was no Significant Difference among Different Root Regions (P＞0.05). Therefore Cercon May be more Suitable to be Used as Post Materials than Cosmopost. Surface Treatments have Significant Effect on Push-out Bond Strength of Zirconia Oxide Post and SB+SC+SI Group Presents Better Bond Strength than SB+SI Group.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 833)
• Pages: 177-180
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.833.177
• Online since: November 2013
• Authors: Guo Xi Yu, Song Zhang, Zhang Fan
• Keywords: Bond Strength, Root, Surface Treatment, Zirconia Oxide

References

[1] A.R. Giovani, LP Vansan, M.D. de Sousa Neto, S.M. Paulino, In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber and cast metal posts with different lengths, J Prosthet Dent. (101)2009 183-188.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(09)60025-1

[2] G. Heydecke, F. Butz, A. Hussein, J.R. Strub, Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post and core systems, J Prosthet Dent. (87)2002 438-445.

DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123849

[3] P.F. Manicone, P.R. Iommetti, L. Raffaelli, An overview of zirconia ceramics: Basic properties and clinical applications, J Dent. (35)2007 819-826.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008

[4] A. Casucci, E. Osorio, R. Osorio, F. Monticelli, M. Toledano, C. Mazzitelli, Ferrari Influence of different surface treatments on surface zirconia Frameworks, J Dent. (37)2009 891-897.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.013

[5] M.N. Aboushelib, J.P. Matinlinna, Z. Salameh, H. Ounsi, Innovations in bonding to zirconia-based materials, Part I, Dent Mater. (24)2008 1268-1272.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.010

[6] A.M. Spohr, L.C. Sobrinho, S. Consani, M.A. Sinhoreti, J.C. Knowles, Influence of surface conditions and silane agent on the bond of resin to IPS Empress 2 ceramic, Intl J Prosthodont. (16)2003 277-282.

[7] R. Amaral, M. Ozcan, M.A. Bottino, L.F. Valandro, Microtensile reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning, Dent Mater. (22)2006 283-290.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.021

[8] J.P. Matinlinna, T. Heikkinen, M. Ozcan, L.V. Lassila, P.K. Vallittu, Evaluation of resin adhesion to zirconia ceramic using some organosilanes, Dent Mater. (22)2006 824-831.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.035

[9] S.S. Atsu , M.A. Kilicarslan, H.C. Kucukesmen, P.S. Aka, Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin, J Prosthet Dent. (95)2006 430-436.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016

[10] G. Akgungor, D. Sen, M. Aydin, Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material, J Prosthet Dent. (99)2008 388-399.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(08)60088-8

[11] P. Oskoee, E. Navimipour, M. Oskoee, M. Bahari, F. Purnaghiazar, Effect of different adhesion strategies on push-out bond Strength of fiber reinforced composite posts, African Journal of Biotechnology. (10)2011 17593-17598.

DOI: 10.5897/ajb11.2019