The Effect of Inclusions on Internal Cracks for 20Mn5N Steel Ingot after Forging

Article Preview

Abstract:

The heavy forging ingots of steel 20Mn5N have been extensively used to fabricate the hydropower shaft steel, which plays as an extremely important part in industry. However, the quality of the heavy ingots has been commonly affected by various inner defects. One of the most typical defects is internal cracks, which has been found to be always accompanied by inclusions. In order to effectively analyze the formation of internal cracks, a 30-ton 20Mn5N ingot has been cut along the axle plane. Exceeding macroscopic cracks can be found in macro-segregation area gathered many large and grid inclusions (Al2O3). Based on the experimental results and FEM simulation method we have investigated that large and grid inclusions accompanied by other macro-visible defects such as banded structure could lead to the forging cracks easily. FEM simulation result shows that the stress concentration resulting from the large and grid inclusions (Al2O3) is relatively large. These large and grid inclusions accompanied by banded structure are the fundamental cause of cracks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 834-836)

Pages:

829-838

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. C. Flemings, ISIJ Int., Vol. 40 (2000), pp.833-841.

Google Scholar

[2] Campbell J. Castings. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] Dianzhong Li, Campbell J, Yiyi Li. J. Mater. Process Tech., Vol. 148(2004), pp.310-6.

Google Scholar

[4] Hu BH, Tong KK, Niu XP, Pinwill I. J. Mater. Process Tech., Vol. 105(2000), pp.128-33.

Google Scholar

[5] H.V. Atkinson, G. Shi. Progress in Mater. Sci., Vol. 48(2003), pp.457-520.

Google Scholar

[6] D. Sohn, J. H. Lim, Y. S. Cho, J. H. Kim, S. Im. J. Computational Physics, Vol. 230(2011), pp.6866-6899.

Google Scholar

[7] Sadananda, K. and A. Vasudevan. Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 19(1997), pp.99-108.

Google Scholar

[8] Jajam, K.C. and H.V. Tippur. Int. J. Solids Struct. (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] R.D. Thomos, J.W. Hancock. in: Procedings of the ICM4, Vol II, Stockholm, Sweden, 1983, 733.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Nagayama, T. Abe, S. Nagaki. Computational Mechanics, Vol. 4(1989), pp.433-441.

Google Scholar

[11] Ohashi. T, Hiromoto. T, Fujii. H, Nuri. Y, Asano. K. ISIJ. Int., Vol. 62(1976), pp.614-623.

Google Scholar

[12] Guocheng wang, Lifeng Zhang. Iron and steel, Vol. 47 (2012), pp.22-26. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Guosen Zhu, Xinhua Wang, Huixiang Yu, Wanjun Wang. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, Vol. 16(2004), pp.43-46. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Guofa Mi, Hongyan Nan, Yanlei Liu, Bin Zhang, Hong Zhang, Guoxiang Song. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, Vol. 18(2001), pp.49-54.

Google Scholar

[15] Tripathi, N. and D. Sichen. Scandinavian J. Metal., Vol. 33(2004), pp.362-369.

Google Scholar

[16] Lifeng Zhang, B. Rietow, B. G. Thomas, K. Eakin. ISIJ, Int., Vol. 46(2006), pp.670-679.

Google Scholar

[17] Xishan Jiang. Beijing, Metallurgical Industry Press, (2011).

Google Scholar

[18] Lifeng Zhang, B.G. Thomas. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Vol. (2006), pp.733-761.

Google Scholar

[19] Liu Delu, Shao Weiran, Sun Xianwen, Huo Xiangdong, Mao Xinping, Li Leijun. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, Vol. 27(2005), pp.40-44. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[20] Krauss, G. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Vol. 34(2003), pp.781-792.

Google Scholar