The Importance of Understanding the Stakeholders in Industry Actions - A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective

Abstract:

A great pressure has arisen lately in the business world by movements like occupy Wall Street, or more concerning economic crises started in 2008. Due to this pressure, companies have to be more careful and act more responsibly. In the recent years, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been seen like a panacea of all stakeholders problems, more and more reports of CSR being published on companies website. However, it has been proven that just to claim actions of social responsibility, does not mean those companies are truly responsible. As expected, this behavior is penalized by a part of stakeholders. In this context, for each firm is important to know which are the most representative stakeholders, and how a certain situation could affect this scale. For explaining this fact, this paper analyzes the case of Brent Spar, pointing how an industrial giant like Shell, using a wrong CSR policy, could lose both money and image capital. In order to do that, in the first part is discussed the CSR from the perspective of stakeholder theory. Although it is present since 1950s in the United States of America and evolved all over the world like an all known concept, CSR does not have yet an universally accepted definition. Therefore, in this article was stated a definition for CSR from the stakeholder theory approach, in order to understand the Brent Spar actions and implications. In the second part of the paper are analyzed the steps taken by both sides, on one hand by Shell and on the other, by some of the stakeholders. The actions have been explained from the CSR paradigm perspective. Finally, it is proved why Brent Spar is a case of CSR failed, and how, by neglecting of some stakeholders categories, a company could pay important costs. Moreover, the paper demonstrates that the image of one company, from a specific area, could affect the all industry field. Therefore, a proper identification of key stakeholders, a good communication with those and flexibility in decision, could be the success factors for companies, and may lead to successful CSR. Correct CSR actions become an imperative in nowadays industrial scenario, being viewed as a change imposed by globalization and by the transnational nature of CSR.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 837)
• Pages: 669-672
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.837.669
• Online since: November 2013
• Authors: Ioana Teodoreanu, Cristian Ionut Ivanov
• Keywords: Brent Spar, Industrial Scenario, Stakeholder Dialog

References

[1] D. Matten, S. Moon, Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), (2008), 404‐424.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2008.31193458

[2] H. R Bowen, Social responsibilities of the businessman, NewYork: Harper&Row, (1953).

[3] M. Friedman, The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, New York Times Magazine, p.32, 13September (1970).

[4] R. W. Ackerman, How companies respond to social demands. Harvard University Review, 51(4), (1973) 88‐98.

[5] S.P. Sethi, Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17(3), (1975) 58‐64.

DOI: 10.2307/41162149

[6] A.B. Carroll, Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business &Society, 38(3), (1999) 268‐295.

DOI: 10.1177/000765039903800303

[7] A.B. Carroll, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, Southwestern Publishing, Cincinnati, (1993).

[8] R. E Freeman, Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing, USA, (1984).

[9] M.S. Fifka, The Impact of Socioeconomic and Political Factors on Stakeholder Dialog, in A. Lindgreen, P. Kotler, J. Vanhamme, F. Maon (Eds. ), A stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: Pressures, Conflicts and Reconciliations, Gower Publishing Limited, England, 2012, pp.5-24.

DOI: 10.4324/9781315565255

[10] A. Crane, D. Matten, J. Moon, Stakeholders as citizen? Rethinking rights, participation and democracy, Journal of Business Ethics, 53 (2004) 107-122.

DOI: 10.1023/b:busi.0000039403.96150.b6

[11] M.S. Fifka, Brent Spart Revised: Conflict and Cooperation from a Stakeholder Perspective, in A. Lindgreen, P. Kotler, J. Vanhamme, F. Maon (Eds. ), A stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: Pressures, Conflicts and Reconciliations, Gower Publishing Limited, England, 2012, pp.59-74.

DOI: 10.4324/9781315565255

[12] Information on http: /www. ospar. org/content/content. asp?menu=01481200000000_00000 0_000000.

[13] Information on http: /www. awen. wiso. uni-erlangen. de/lehrveranstaltungen/ws/diplom/Ueb _Corporate/files/msf_cg1_ws1112. pdf.