A Study on Plastic Deformations due to Contact Fatigue Wear on a Metallic Coating Deposed in Electric Arc

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper studies the way how a sample with a 40Cr130 coating behaves to contact fatigue wear from the perspective of plastic deformations. The sample is made of an 18MnCr11 alloy steel. The coating was deposited in electric arc using the Smart Arc 350 installation from Sulzer Metco. The samples was subjected to fatigue wear on the AMSLER installation in limit and mixed lubrication conditions. The samples were subjected to wear for 30 hours, at a loading force of 177 N. The moving sample had a rotational speed of 375 rot/min. Different combinations of contact materials were used for the test samples: coating coating and coating base material. The results were highlighted using the QUANTA 200 3D DUAL BEAM electron microscope.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

9-15

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Gwidon W. Stachowiak and Andrew W. Batchelor (1993), E n g i n e e r i n g T r i b o l o g y, Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam, ISBN 0-444-892354.

Google Scholar

[2] W.A. Glaeser and S.J. Shaffer, Contact Fatigue, ASM Handbook, Volume 19: Fatigue and Fracture. Bo Alfredsson, A Study on Contact Fatigue Mechanisms, ISSN 1104-6813.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v19.a0002373

Google Scholar

[3] Per Lindholm and Fredrik Svahn, Study of thickness dependence of sputtered-carbon coating for low friction valve lifters, Wear 261 (2006) 241–250.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.10.002

Google Scholar

[4] Ramalhoa and J.C. Miranda, The relationship between wear and dissipated energy in sliding systems, Wear 260 (2006) 361–367.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.121

Google Scholar

[5] Nagaraj Nayaka, P.A. Lakshminarayanan, M.K. Gajendra Babu and A.D. Dani, Predictions of cam follower wear in diesel engines, Wear 260 (2006) 181–192.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.022

Google Scholar