Experimental Study on the Impact of Jet Penetration with Different Spacing Interval

Article Preview

Abstract:

Using the experimental method with different spacing interval determined the degree of the target to the jet penetration ability. In order to verify the effect of interval size on the jet penetration, sunder armor ammunition simulation experiment was carried out, using a 40-mm sunder armor ammunition penetrated designed target plate. Through the study of residual penetration data, verify and sort out the regulations of the jet penetration. The experimental results show that the interval of the target of jet penetration has more adverse effect, at the same time also can reduce the diameter of the jet hole, the jet attenuation effect is obvious.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 838-841)

Pages:

188-191

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z. Liang, H. Hu and Y. Jiao, Experiment Study on the Ultimate Adverse Effect of the Space between Target Plates on Jet Penetration Depth, Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, vol. 26, no. 1, pp.12-15, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Mi and J. He, Equivalent Target and Terminal Velocity of Fragments in Battle Damage simulation, ACTA ARMAMENTER, vol. 26, no. 5, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Gao, The Research Status of Equivalent Spaced Targets in Armor-Penetration Projectile Power Test, Advanced Materials Research vol. 785-786, part 2, pp.1282-1285, (2013).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.785-786.1282

Google Scholar

[4] G. Zhao and Y. Yang, Equivalent Surrogates for Armor Target Damage Assessment by Kinetic Energy Projectiles, Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp.509-514, (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Yang and G. Zhao, Surrogates for Armor Targets Vulnerability Assessment, Fire Control & Command Control, vol. 28, no. 6, pp.81-84, (2003).

Google Scholar