The Influence of Three Different Types of Herbicides on Biodiversity

Article Preview

Abstract:

We used methods such as microorganism cultivation and PCR-DGGE to examine the influence of glyphosate, paraquat, and xiao suo (used exclusively in China) on biodiversity. Two weeks after herbicide application, the strongest herbicidal effect was observed from paraquat, followed by glyphosate and then xiao suo. Although weed suppression was maintained over the effective period of each herbicide, surface vegetation gradually recovered after one month. Levels of soil bacteria and fungi were noticeably altered by exposure to herbicide. Actinomycetes were unaffected, however. Bacterial genetic diversity obviously changed, with some DGGE bands disappearing. Although several DGGE bands were lost, fungal genetic diversity remained constant. Actinomycetes remained constant. Overall, glyphosate and paraquat had stronger culling effects on surface plants than xiao suo, whereas glyphosate and xiao suo had stronger effects on soil microorganisms than paraquat. The results have implications for agriculture production, and provide information related to soil ecological stability and recovery for use in ecological management of economic forests.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 838-841)

Pages:

2417-2426

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bo Tao, Lingxue Jiang, Xiaofeng Shen, Fengxia Luan, Lijuan Qiu: Chinese journal of crop sciences. Vol. 33(2011), pp.162-168. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] DingCheng Huang, MinSheng You, YouMing Hou, ZhiSheng Li: Acta Ecological Sinica. Vol. 25(2005), pp.1451-1458. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Lan Zhao, Huashou Li: Journal of Agro-Environment Science. Vol. 27(2008), pp.508-514. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Tiehang Wu, Dan O. Chellemi, Kendall J. Martin, Jim H. Graham, Erin N. Rosskopf: Soil Biology & Biochemistry. Vol. 39(2007), pp.1139-1155.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.11.024

Google Scholar

[5] Liuting Pan: Modern Agricultural Science and Technology. Vol. 14(2012), pp.202-203. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Huiwen Zhang, Qixing Zhou, Qianru Zhang, Chenggang Zhang: Environmental Science. Vol. 25(2004), pp.143-148. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] Haifeng Luo, Hongyan Qi, Hongxun Zhang: Acta Microbiological Sinica. Vol. 44(2004), pp.519-522. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Haijun Cui, Xiaoli Wu, Zhongjun Zhang, Na Yuan: Acta Agricultural Universitatis Jiangxiensis. Vol. 33(2011), pp.1082-1087. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[15] Caiwu Wu, Lanpo Zhao: Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. Vol. 27(2011), pp.231-235. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Xue Yuan, Fu Hua: Journal of Capital Nomal University. Vol. 31(2010), pp.19-23. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] Mingdao Wang, Zongwei Wu, Zengyan Yuan, Hongge Cheng, Kun Wu, Xincheng Jia: Journal of Henan Agricultural University. Vol. 42(2008), pp.532-538. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] Shaoquan Su, He1i Geng: Agrochemicals. Vol. 47(2008), pp.244-247. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[13] Chunhong Teng, Shaoquan Su: Agrochemicals. Vol. 45(2006), pp.505-507. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[14] Hanbo Zhang, Changqun Duan, Lianghu Qu: Chinese Journal of Ecology. Vol. 22(2003), pp.131-136. In Chinese.

Google Scholar