Assessment of Mixing Efficiency of Intermeshing Rotor Mixers on Morphological and Mechanical Properties and Crosslink Density of Dynamically Vulcanized EPDM/PP Blends

Article Preview

Abstract:

The mixing efficiency of intermeshing rotor internal batch mixers for the preparation of rubber-rich thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPV) based on ethylene propylene diene terpolymer (EPDM) and polypropylene (PP) blends was investigated. Two laboratory scale mixers, namely intensive batch mixer (INS) and kneader batch mixer (KND), were used. The mixer choice at controlled mixing conditions was investigated to determine its effects on morphological and mechanical properties and crosslink density of the prepared EPDM/PP TPVs. Such effects were found on the degradation of the polymer, on the distribution of the EPDM phase in the blend morphology, particularly the size of EPDM inclusion, and on the crosslink density of the EPDM phase. In summary, the different mixing efficiencies of INS and KND type mixers affect the EPDM/PP TPVs and their properties. Also, the INS mixer has higher mixing efficiency than the KND mixer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

122-126

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Naskar, Thermoplastic elastomers by dynamic vulcanisation, in: J. White, S.K. De, K. Naskar (Eds. ), Rubber Technologist's Handbook, Lightning Source UK, United Kingdom, 2009, pp.219-248.

Google Scholar

[2] T. Moribe, Advanced intermeshing mixers for energy saving and reduction of environmental impact, Mitsubishi Heavy Ind. Tech. Rev. 49 (2012) 38-43.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Koolhiran, J.L. White, Comparison of intermeshing rotor and traditional rotors of internal mixers in dispersing silica and other filler, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 78 (2000) 1551-1554.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-4628(20001121)78:8<1551::aid-app120>3.0.co;2-#

Google Scholar

[4] R.R. Babu, N.K. Singha, K. Naskar, Phase morphology and melt rheological behavior of uncrosslinked and dynamically crosslinked polyolefin blend: Role of macromolecular structure, Polym. Bull. 66 (2011) 95-117.

DOI: 10.1007/s00289-010-0328-4

Google Scholar

[5] C.F. Antunes, M. van Duin, A.V. Machado, Effect of crosslinking on morphology and phase inversion of EPDM/PP blends, Mater. Chem. Phys. 133 (2012) 410-418.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.01.053

Google Scholar

[6] S. Varghese, S. Alex, B. Kuriakose, Natural rubber-isotactic polypropylene thermoplastic blends, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 92 (2004) 2063-(2068).

DOI: 10.1002/app.20077

Google Scholar

[7] R.M.A. l'Abee, Thermoplastic Vulcanizates; The Rubber Particle Size to Control the Properties-Processing Balance, Gildeprint Drukkerijen, The Netherlands, 2009, pp.17-41.

Google Scholar