Tool-Life of Wiper and Standard Cutting Tool in Finish Turning of SAE 4140

Article Preview

Abstract:

Vibration tendency can rise in turning process when selecting a cutting tool with larger nose radius and/or increasing the feed rate. As consequence, it may affect the process performance by reducing the tool-life and causing damage to the machined surface finish. Moreover, the generated surface roughness strongly depends on the relation between feed rate and cutting tool nose radius. The wiper cutting tool is a recent technological advancement which is claimed to allow both the feed rate and the depth of cut to be doubled while maintaining the same surface finish value in comparison with standard tools. Thus, the objective of this paper is to benchmark tool-life of standard and wiper cutting tools in dry finish turning of SAE 4140 steel. The analysis consists of successive measurements of workpiece roughness and tool corner wear after each turning pass while using combined machining parameters for a target roughness average value close to 2 μm with both inserts being used under the manufacturers recommended cutting conditions. It is noted that the two inserts presented good performance both in the workpiece finish and in tool-wear.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

760-764

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Childs, K. Maekaka, T. Obikawa, Y. Yamane, Metal Machining: Theory and Applications. Butterworth‐Heinemann, London, 2000, 406p.

Google Scholar

[2] T. R. Thomas, Rough Surface, Longman, London, 1982, 261p.

Google Scholar

[3] ABNT NBR 6163, Geometry of the cutting part of the tools, reference systems and angles on the wedge and the cutting edge, Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, São Paulo, 1990, 45 p.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Klocke, Manufacturing Processes 1: Cutting, RWTH Aachen. Springer, 2011, 522p.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Kalpakjian, S. R. Schmid, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 6. ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2010, 1176p.

Google Scholar

[6] V. P. Astakhov, Geometry of Single Point Turning Tools and Drills – Fundamentals and Practical Applications. Heidelberg, Springer, 2010, 565p.

Google Scholar

[7] Sandvik, Metalcutting Technical Guide, General turning, Sandvik Coromant, 2012, 156 p.

Google Scholar

[8] W. Grzesik, T. Wanat, Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 46, No. 15, 2006, p.1988-(1995).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.009

Google Scholar

[9] E. A. Correia and J. P. Davim, Surface roughness measurement in turning carbon steel AISI 1045 using wiper inserts, Measurement, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2011, p.1000–1005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.01.018

Google Scholar

[10] A. E. Diniz, F. C. Marcondes, N. L. Coppini, Tecnologia da Usinagem dos Materiais, 8. ed., Artliber, São Paulo, 2013, 272p.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Geier and A. J. Souza, Assessment of surface roughness in dry finish turning operations of AISI 4140 steel using wiper cutting tools, Proceedings of COBEM – 21th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, (2011).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.845.929

Google Scholar