Optimization of Exit Design Based on Evacuation Model for Limited Visibility

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the evacuation strategies and the update rules for limited visibility are proposed. The formulas on single exit, double exits and four exits for low pedestrian density are deduced and showed; and the time ratio is 1: 0.71: 0.56. The simulation results show that for normal visibility, the exit should be designed in the middle of wall, which results in the shortest evacuation time. So each exit is designed in the middle of wall. Moreover, in the different exit cases the evacuation can be simulated very well using the proposed model; and the time ratio on single exit, double exits and four exits is 1: 0.68: 0.57,which is close to the theory value 1: 0.71: 0.56. More, the evacuation evolution of different pedestrian number is studied; and the results show that if no jamming, the time ratios of different pedestrian number accord with the theory value 1: 0.71: 0.56 mainly, which proves the correctness of evacuation model and theory analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

749-754

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Helbing, L. Farkas, T. Vicsek, Simulating dynamical features of escape Panic, Nature, 407(28) (2000) 487-490.

DOI: 10.1038/35035023

Google Scholar

[2] J. Ma, S. M. Lo, W. G. Song, Cellular automaton modeling approach for optimum ultra high-rise building evacuation design, Fire Saf. J. 54 (2012) 57–66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.07.008

Google Scholar

[3] E. M. Cepolina, Phased evacuation: an optimisation model which takes into account the capacity drop phenomenon in pedestrian flows, Fire Saf. J. 44 (4) (2009) 532–544.

DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.11.002

Google Scholar

[4] H. J. Huang, R. Y. Guo, Static floor field and exit choice for pedestrian evacuation in rooms with internal obstacles and multiple exits [J],Phys. Rev. E 78 (2008) (021131)1~6.

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.78.021131

Google Scholar

[5] D. Helbing, M. Isobe, T. Nagatani, K. Takimo, Lattice gas simulation of experimentally studied evacuation dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 67 (2003) (067101) 1-4.

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.67.067101

Google Scholar

[6] M. Isobe, D. Helbing, T. Nagatani, Experiment theory and simulation of the evacuation of a room without visibility. Phys. Rev. E 69 (2004) (066132) 1-10.

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.69.066132

Google Scholar

[7] M. Fukamachi, T. Nagatani, Sidle effect on pedestrian counter flow, Phys. A, 377 (2007) 269-278.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.11.035

Google Scholar

[8] H. Yue, C. F. Shao, Z. S . Yao, Pedestrian evacuation flow simulation based on cellular automata, Acta Phys. Sin. 58 (7) (2009) 4523-4531.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Yue, C. F. Shao, H. Z. Guan, L. M. Duan, Simulation of pedestrian evacuation flow with affected visual field using cellular automata, Acta Phys. Sin. 59 (7) (2010) 4499-4507.

Google Scholar

[10] W. F. Yuan, K. H. Tan, An evacuation model using cellular automata, Phys. A, 384 (2007) 549-566.

Google Scholar