Comparison of Human Articular Cartilage and Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel as Artificial Cartilage in Microstructure Analysis and Unconfined Compression

Abstract:

Many biomaterials have been developed to replace articular cartilage. One of these materials, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel is proposed to be used as artificial cartilage in joint replacement. To better understand the differences between human articular cartilage and PVA hydrogel, microstructure analysis and unconfined compression were developed. In microstructure analysis, the surface of articular cartilage was smooth and free from any significant morphological features. Some small holes were found in the surface and cross-section of PVA hydrogel. The porous structure of PVA hydrogel was observed clearly by Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). In unconfined compression tests, the compression modulus of articular cartilage was higher than that of PVA hydrogel. In the creep tests, the strain value of articular cartilage was lower than that of PVA hydrogel all the time. It is indicated that the microstructure of each material has a great influence on their biphasic property which related to their mechanical behavior.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 87-88)
• Pages: 188-193
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.87-88.188
• Online since: December 2009
• Authors: Feng Li, Yong Lin Su, Du Fang Shi, Cheng Tao Wang
• Keywords: Biomaterial, Cartilage, Compression, Hydrogel, Microstructure

References

[1] F. C. Linn, Journal of Biomechanics 1 (1968), p.193.

[2] V. Wright and D. Dowson, Journal of Anatomy 121 (1976), p.107.

[3] R. Brocklehurst, M. T. Bayliss and A. Maroudas, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A 66 (1984), p.95.

[4] A. Unsworth, Tribology International 28 (1995), p.485.

[5] F. Di Fazio, W. Y. Shon, E. A. Salvati and P. D. Wilson Jr, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A 84 (2002), p.204.

[6] A. N. Suciu, T. Iwatsubo, M. Matsuda and T. Nishino, JSME International Journal, Series C: Mechanical Systems, Machine Elements and Manufacturing 47 (2004), p.199.

DOI: 10.1299/jsmec.47.199

[7] M. Oka, K. Ushio, P. Kumar, K. Ikeuchi, S. H. Hyon, T. Nakamura and H. Fujita, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 214 (2000) , p.59.

DOI: 10.1243/0954411001535246

[8] K. S. Anseth, C. N. Bowman and L. Brannon-Peppas, Biomaterials 17 (1996), p.1647.

[9] T. F. Shklyar, A. P. Safronov, I. S. Klyuzhin, G. Pollack and F. A. Blyakhman, Biophysics 53 (2008), p.544.

[10] H. Forster and J. Fisher, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 213 (1999), p.329.

[11] E. Northwood and J. Fisher, Clinical Biomechanics 22 (2007), p.834.

[12] J. E. Pickard, J. Fisher, E. Ingham and J. Egan, Biomaterials 19 (1998), p.1807.

[13] R. D. Bloebaum and A. S. Wilson, Journal of Anatomy 131 (1980), p.333.

[14] I. C. Clarke, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 30 (1971), p.15.

[15] D. L. Garner and D. C. McGillivray, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 30 (1971), p.3.

[16] S. L. Graindorge and G. W. Stachowiak, Wear 241 (2000), p.143.

[17] S. Kobayashi, S. Yonekubo and Y. Kurogouchi, Journal of Anatomy 188 (1996), p.311.

[18] V. C. Mow and W. M. Lai, SIAM Review 22 (1980), p.275.

[19] S. S. Pawaskar, Z. M. Jin and J. Fisher, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 221 (2007), p.165.

[20] G. Wu, PhD Thesis. Shanghai Jiaotong University, (2007), p.58.