The Method of Web Image Annotation Classification Automatic

Article Preview

Abstract:

It has been heavy work that to find the related pictures form Internet without annotation. Therefore, the automatic image annotation was extremely important in image retrieval. The traditional method were translated image visual feature into keywords simply, but it ignored the image similarity problem between the low-level visual features and high-level semantic. That is image "gap" problem, so image annotation was very lower. This paper puts forward a classification of web based image content automatic tagging mixing technology, the first it will map visual feature of image to one or more rough images, then we will preprocess the web page text information, finally we select some keywords similarity as image annotation by using similar semantic processing module. So it realizes the image and text combining the automatic annotation and it achieve high precision of image annotation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 889-890)

Pages:

1323-1326

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Duygulu, K. Barnard, N. de Freitas, and D. Forsyth. Object recognition as machine translation: Learning a lexicon for a fixed image vocabulary. In Seventh European Conf. on computer Vision, pages 97-112, (2002).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47979-1_7

Google Scholar

[2] P. Brown, S. D. Pietra, V. D. Pietra, and R. Mercer. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. In Computational Linguistics, 19(2): 263-311, (1993).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Jeon, V. Lavrenko and R. Manmatha. Automatic Image Annotation and Retrieval using Cross-Media Relevance Models. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference, pages 119-126, (2003).

DOI: 10.1145/860435.860459

Google Scholar

[4] V. Lavrenko, S. L. Feng, and R. Manmatha. Statistical models for automatic video annotation and retrieval. In Proc. IEEE International Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, volume 3, pages 17-21, May (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2004.1326727

Google Scholar

[5] Christiane Fellbaum. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, MIT Press, (1998).

Google Scholar

[6] P. Resnik. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. Proceedings of 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, 1995, pp.448-453.

Google Scholar

[7] Leacock, C., and Chodorow, M. Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In Fellbaum, C. ed., WordNet: An electronic lexical database, MIT Press, 265-283, (1998).

DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/7287.003.0018

Google Scholar