Layout of Nanotechnology Patents in Global Market

Article Preview

Abstract:

Patents are the manifest output of market layout. Based on global nanotechnology patents applied from 1991 to 2010, which are collected by Derwent Innovation Index database, this paper elaborates the distribution and development trends of nanotechnology in global market, through the quantitative analysis of patent distribution in five nanomarkets (materials & process, electronics & devices, biology & medicine, instrument & measurement), in hope of providing an objective statistic reference for future policy directions and academic researches.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 889-890)

Pages:

1578-1584

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. R. Chen, H. W. Chang, M. H. Huang and F. C. Fu, Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978-2002: A perspective from patent analysis, Scientometrics, Vol. 64 (2005), pp.31-53.

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0236-9

Google Scholar

[2] M. Meyer, What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors, Scientometrics, Vol. 70 (2007), pp.779-810.

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-0312-4

Google Scholar

[3] Y. G. Yang, Study on patent classification for nanotechnology, Nanoelectronic Device & Technology, vol. 12 (2007), pp.1048-1062.

Google Scholar

[4] Meyer, M. Patent citations in a novel field of technology: What can they tell about interactions of emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, Vol. 48, Issue. 2 (2000), p.151–178.

Google Scholar

[5] Meyer, M. Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics, Vol. 51, Issue. 1 (2001), p.163–183.

Google Scholar

[6] Braun, T., Schubert, A., &Zsindely, S. Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, Vol. 38, Issue. 2 (1997), p.321–325.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02457417

Google Scholar

[7] Huang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, Z. K., &RoCo, M. C. International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 6, Issue. 4 (2004).

DOI: 10.1007/s11051-004-4117-6

Google Scholar

[8] Hullmann, A., &Meyer, M. Publications and patents in nanotechnology An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, Vol. 58, Issue. 3 (2003), pp.507-527.

DOI: 10.1023/b:scie.0000006877.45467.a7

Google Scholar

[9] Kostoff, R. N., Stump, J. A., Johnson, D., Murday, J. S., &Lau, C. G. Y. The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 3-4 (2006), pp.301-321.

DOI: 10.1007/s11051-005-9035-8

Google Scholar

[10] Lee, L. L., Chan, C. K., Ngaim, M., &Ramakeishna, S. Nanotechnology patent landscape 2006. Nanotechnology, Vol. 1, Issue. 2 (2006), p.101–113.

Google Scholar

[11] Marinova, D., &McAleer, M. Nanotechnology strength indicators: international rankings based on US patents. Nanotechnology, Vol. 14, Issue. 1 (2003), p. R1-R7.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/14/1/201

Google Scholar

[12] Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., &Schoeneck, D. J. Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 10, Issue. 5 (2008), p.715–728.

DOI: 10.1007/s11051-007-9266-y

Google Scholar

[13] Schummer, J. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, Vol. 59, Issue. 3 (2004), pp.425-465.

DOI: 10.1023/b:scie.0000018542.71314.38

Google Scholar

[14] Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., &Chan, C. K. Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, Vol. 70, Issue. 3 (2007), pp.715-737.

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-0309-z

Google Scholar