Corrosion Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel in High Sulphate Content

Abstract:

Austenitic stainless steels especially 316L has been used extensively in many sectors including construction, medical and household appliances due to their highly resistance to corrosion attack, reasonable cost and excel in mechanical properties. However, in corrosive media, 316L are susceptible to localised corrosion attack especially in seawater and high temperature. The corrosiveness of media increased as the anions contents increased. This paper presents the corrosion mechanism of 316L exposed to high concentration of sulphate in the salinity of seawater. The solution (media) was prepared according to the same composition as seawater including pH, salinity and dissolved oxygen. The corrosion mechanism were characterized to breakdown potential (E_b) of 316L which are the potential once reaches a sufficiently positive value and also known as pitting potential. This is the most point where localized corrosion susceptibility to evaluate and considered a potential, which could be an appropriate point according to any given combination of material/ambient/testing methods. The E_b value were identified at 4°C, 20°C, 50°C and 80°C and compared with E_b value of 316L in seawater. The E_b value of 316L in high sulphate are higher compared to seawater in every temperature which elucidate that some anions accelerate corrosion attack whereas some anions such as sulphate behaves as inhibiting effect to 316L.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 893)
• Pages: 397-401
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.893.397
• Online since: February 2014
• Authors: Azzura Ismail
• Keywords: 316L, Breakdown Potential, Localized Corrosion, Open Circuit Potential (OCP), Passive Range, Sulphate-Chloride Ratio, Temperature

References

[1] M.G. Fontana, Corrosion Engineering, McGraw-Hill, 1987, pp.3-13.

[2] Smith W.F., Principles of materials science and engineering1996: McGraw Hill.

[3] Roberg P.R., Corrosion engineering: Principles and practice: McGraw-Hill, 2008, p.5, 169-177.

[4] Thompson N. G. and Payer J.H., DC electrochemical test methods. Vol. 6. 1998. 98.

[5] Sedriks A.J., Corrosion stainless steel1979: John Wiley & Sons, New York. 282.

[6] Dexter S. C. and Gao G.Y., Corrosion, 1988. 44: p.717.

[7] Laitinen T., Localized corrosion of stainless steel in chloride, sulfate and thiosulfate containing environments. Corrosion Science, 2000. 42(3): pp.421-441.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-938x(99)00072-4

[8] Pistorius P.C. and Burstein G.T., Growth of corrosion pits on stainless steel in chloride solution containing dilute sulphate. Corrosion science, 1992. 33(12): pp.1885-1897.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(92)90191-5

[9] Tait W.S., An introduction to electrochemistry corrosion testing for practicing engineers and scientist, 1994, PairODocs Publications. p.119.

[10] Stellwag B., The mechanism of oxide film formation on austenitic stainless steels in high temperature water. Corrosion Science, 1998. 40(2/3): pp.337-370.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-938x(97)00140-6

[11] Garfias-Mesias L. F., Sykes J.M., Metastable pitting in 25 Cr duplex stainless steel. Corrosion Science, 1999. 41(5): pp.959-987.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-938x(98)00165-6

[12] Kirkov P., The influence of halide ion concentration on the effects of surface active inhibitors in strong electrolytes. Corrosion Science, 1973. 13(10): pp.697-706.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-938x(73)80008-3