Effect of Tool Path Strategies in Pocket Milling of Aluminium Epoxy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Selection of the most suitable tool path strategy is very essential during machining especially in computer aided design and manufacture (CAD/CAM) as well as computer numerical control (CNC) machining. Existence of various tool path strategies to be applied on advanced composite materials such as aluminium epoxy required extensive researches in determining the best combination of tool path and cutting parameters for better machinability performance. Pocket milling of aluminium epoxy specimen via CAD/CAM was conducted in this study to investigate the effect of three types of tool path strategies namely Inward Helical, Outward Helical and Back and Forth. Uncoated high speed steel (HSS-Co8) ball end mill was used throughout the experiments. The machining responses that were evaluated include machining time, tool wear rate, tool life and surface finish of the machined pockets. In general, the effect of tool path strategy was highly significant on the machining responses and results showed that Back and Forth strategy offered the best machinability results when compared to the other strategies.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

15-20

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Jacobs, P. F, Stereo lithography and Other RP&M Technologies – from Rapid Prototyping to Rapid Tooling, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), New York, (1996).

DOI: 10.1177/1063293x9600400209

Google Scholar

[2] Ruben W. Lanz, Shreyes N. Melkote, Mahesh A. Kotnis, Machinability of Rapid Tooling Composite Board, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 127 (2002) 242 – 245.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00150-4

Google Scholar

[3] Chinmaya R. Dandekar, Yung C. Shin, Modeling of Machining of Composite Materials: A Review, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 57 (2012) 102 – 121.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.01.006

Google Scholar

[4] N. Tomac, K. Tonnesson, Machining of Particulate Al Matrix Composites, Annals of the CIRP 41(1) (1992) 55 – 58.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61151-2

Google Scholar

[5] Ruben W. Lanz, Shreyes N. Melkote, Mahesh Kotnis, Effect of Process Parameters and Tool Shape on the Machinability of a Particulate Filled-Polymer Composite Material for Rapid Tooling, Machining Science and Technology, 5(2) (2001) 217 – 237.

DOI: 10.1081/mst-100107844

Google Scholar

[6] C.K. Toh, A Study of the Effects of Cutter Path Strategies and Orientations in Milling, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 152 (2004) 346–356.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.382

Google Scholar

[7] RenCast CW47 Datasheet, Huntsman Advanced Materials GmbH, Switzerland, March (2007).

Google Scholar