Analysis and Optimization of Rail Vehicles Networked Control System Based on Static Scheduling Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

The system performance of rail vehicles NCS mainly depends on communication performance and control performance. Because of considerably limited availability of computing resources, real-time scheduling of shared resources is among the factors that greatly impact system performance. From a real-time control perspective, the problem of real-time scheduling in NCS is illustrated based on timing analysis of a typical NCS. Take the MVB of rail vehicle NCS for example, The theory and practice of synchronously static Rate Monotonic(RM)are introduced into rail vehicle NCS, with special focus on open-up scheduling and adaptive scheduling, which made communication simplified and reliable. At the same time, build objective function of system performance based on state space equation, wholly benefits optimized design of rail vehicle NCS, considering both communication performance and control performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

600-610

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Cai Guoqiang, Jia Liming. Inauguration Algorithm Analysis of Wire Train. 《Computer Application》, 2007, vol. 16(5): 1-3.

Google Scholar

[2] Liu Yang. Lab Platform Design and Completion of Electricomobile Based on. Dalian Jiaotong University Journal. Ph. D thesis. (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] Yang Fengping, Jiang Yueli. Electronic Traction and Control System Design Based on TCN. Ph.D. thesis Huadong Jiaotong University Journal, 2011, Vol. 28(4): 58-64.

Google Scholar

[4] WangLei. Ananlysis and Research on Train Network Control System. Xinan Jiaotong University Journal. Ph.D. thesis. (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] Juan Carlos Moreno, Member, IEEE. A Link-Layer Slave Device Design of the MVB-TCN Bus (IEC 61375 and IEEE 1473-T). IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2007, VOL. 56(4): 3457-3468.

DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2007.901900

Google Scholar

[6] Manuele Bertoluzzo1 and Giuseppe BujaFellow, IEEE. . Investigation on the Application of a Time-Triggered Protocol Aboard Trains, 2006 - 32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics, IECON 2006, page(s): 3685-3690.

DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2006.347695

Google Scholar

[7] Jaime Jiménez, José L. Martín, Member, IEEE. Design of a Master Device for the Multifunction Vehicle Bus. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2007, VOL. 56(7): 3695-3708.

DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2007.901868

Google Scholar

[8] Zhu Qinyue. Real-time Theory and Method Research on Train Communication Network. Ph. D thesis. Tongji University Journal. (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] WANG Jun-bo, Xu Bu-gong, WANG Qing-yang. Guaranteed Cost Control Analysis of a Class of Networked Control Systems[C]/The 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation(WCICA). Piscataway NJ USA; IEEE Press, 2006: 4561-4565.

DOI: 10.1109/wcica.2006.1713244

Google Scholar

[10] YIN Jin-yong, Guo-Chang. An Approach for Scheduling Aperiodic Real-Time Tasks on a Static Schedule[C]/ Proceedings of the 2th International Conference on Information and Computing Science(ICIC). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2009: 70-74.

DOI: 10.1109/icic.2009.25

Google Scholar

[11] Park,M.; Park,H. An Efficient Test Method for Rate Monononic Schedulability. Computers, IEEE Transactions on, 2012: 1.

Google Scholar

[12] Sangchul Han; Moonju Park; Minkyu Park. Computer and Information Technology(CIT), 2010IEEE 10th International Conference on. 2010: 1751-1757.

Google Scholar

[13] Tao Lin; Yao-Han; Jie-Hua Liu. Research of Scheduling Control Co-design of Networked Control Systems. Intelligent Networks and Intelligent Systems, 2009. ICINIS'09. Second International Conference on. 2009: 201-204.

DOI: 10.1109/icinis.2009.59

Google Scholar

[14] Qixin Zhu; Guangming xie. Analysis and Modeling of Multi-Rate Networked Control Systems with Long Time Delay. Control and Decision Conference(CCDC), 2012: 2978-2983.

DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2012.6244469

Google Scholar

[15] Xiaoyuan Luo; Junling Zhang; Yuan Zhang; Xinping Guan. Active Fault-Tolerant Control for Networked Control Systems with Data Packet Dropout Via Predictive Control. Control Conference(CCC). 2011: 4241-4246.

DOI: 10.1109/chicc.2008.4604926

Google Scholar

[16] Feng-Li Lian Member, IEEE, John K. Yook, Dawn M. Tilbury, Member, IEEE, Network Architecture and Communication Modules for Guaranteeing Acceptable Control and Communication Performance for Networked Multi-Agent Systems. 2006: 12-24.

DOI: 10.1109/tii.2005.857611

Google Scholar

[17] Tavassoli, B. A Continuous-Time Approach to Networked Control of Nonlinear Systems. Decision and Control and Eupropean Control Conference(CDC-ECC), 2011: 217-221.

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2011.6161331

Google Scholar

[18] Wrastawa Ridwan, Riyanto T. Bambang. H_∝ Controller Synthesis for Netwroked Control Systems with Time Delay System Approach. 2011 International Conference on Electrical Engineering ang Informatics. 2011: 15-22.

DOI: 10.1109/iceei.2011.6021577

Google Scholar