An Improved Three-Dimensional Medical Image Segmentation Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an three-dimensional medical image segmentation approach based on Live-Wire algorithm, through the virtual slices extraction to transform the direction of the segmentation from parallel direction into meridian direction, the amount of user interaction is independent of the number of the sequence of medicine images, improves the automation level of medicine images segmentation. This paper also improved the efficiency of traditional Live-Wire algorithm by four binary heap. Experiment shows that the approach can segmented the interest objects from the sequence of medical images rapidly and accurately, with less user interaction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 912-914)

Pages:

1150-1155

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mortensen Eric N, Barrett William A. Interactive Segmentation with Intelligent Scissors[J]. Graphical Models and Image Processing, 1998, 60(5):349-384.

DOI: 10.1006/gmip.1998.0480

Google Scholar

[2] Barrett William A, Mortensen Eric N. Fast, Accurate, and reproducible Live-Wire Boundary Ext-raction[C]. Proceeding of the 4th International Confe-rence on Visualization in Biomedical Computing, Hamburg, Germany, (1996).

DOI: 10.1007/bfb0046953

Google Scholar

[3] Yang Jinzhu, Zhao Shuyin, Hu Ying, etc. approach of sequence medical image segmentation[J], Journal Of System Simulation, 2005, 17(12): 2896-2900.

Google Scholar

[4] Zhao Hong, Meng Lu. An improved interactive CT chest image segmentation approach of lung parenchyma[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2010, 31(2).

Google Scholar

[5] Falcao A X. Udupa J K. Samarasekera S Usersteered image segmentation paradigms: live wire and live lane[J]. Graphical Models and Image Processing, 1998, 60(4):233-2.

DOI: 10.1006/gmip.1998.0475

Google Scholar