The Seismic Performance Analysis for the Ceramsite Concrete Frame – Shear Wall Structure

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper focused on the seismic performance of ceramsite concrete frame—shear wall, which conducted the modal analysis and elasto-plastic time history analysis for 6 layers ceramsite concrete frame—shear wall and ordinary concrete frame—shear wall by software SAP2000. Then compared the results, which showed that the periods of ceramsite concrete frame—shear wall structure was longer than the ordinary concrete frame—shear wall structure, while the inter-storey drift ratio and the maximum absolute acceleration are less than ordinary concrete frame—shear wall. Besides, the largest base shear of ceramsite concrete frame—shear wall structure was less than ordinary concrete frame—shear wall structure. And the seismic performance of ceramsite concrete frame—shear wall showed was better than ordinary concrete frame—shear wall structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 919-921)

Pages:

981-988

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z. F Liu, Z. L Su. Seismic Performance Analysis of Lightweight Aggregate and Ordinary Concrete Frame Structures, [J]. Construction structure, 2010. 02,P. 22—23. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] C. Dundar and B. Sabin, Arbitrarily Shaped Reinforced Concrete Members Subject to Bisxial Bending and Axial Load, Computer and Structures, VOI. 49, NO. 4, (1993).

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(93)90069-p

Google Scholar

[3] S. Wu, Lu, y. Chun. Research on Ultimate Strength of Cross—section of Lightweight Aggregate Reinforced Concrete L-shaped Columns, Guangxi University, 2004. 06. 08,P. 53(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Berton D, Carles—Gibergues A, Balivy G . Contribution to the Formation Mechanism of the Transition Zone Between Pock—Cement and Concrete research, 1993(23) ,P. 23.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(93)90099-u

Google Scholar

[5] T. Wang, L.Y. Meng J.J. Sun. 3—D Elastic—plastic Time History Analysis of Frame—shear Wall Structure, 2009. 19(1),P. 30—33. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] W. Y Wang, C. Y . Lu. Test and Research on Bond Behavior between Deformed Bar and LightweightConcrete, Guangxi University, 2005. 05,P. 57(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] L.L. Ji, W.N. Yun. Nonliner Time History Analysis of Sintered Fly—ash Concrete. Frame Structure. 2012. 06. 09,P. 83—85(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] C.L. Wei, L. Y . WANG. Study on Seismic Behavior of the Concrete—filled Steel Tubular Frame—shear 2013. 01. 002,P. 7(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] SAP2000 Guide to Use of Chinese , Beijing: China Communication Press, 2004,P. 216(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] LIiHongnan editor , seismic design's principle of buildings, 1997,P. 60-86. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar