Dynamic Task Allocation Based on Game Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

Multi-Agent System for task allocation problem, the introduction of game theory for dynamic task allocation modeling Multi-Agent Systems,Multi-Agent System proposed dynamic task allocation algorithm based on game theory.Experimental results show that the lower complexity of dynamic task allocation algorithm based on game theory in this article, the smaller amount of calculation,better robustness,task allocation scheme to obtain higher quality,with higher distribution

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 926-930)

Pages:

2790-2794

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] BotelhoSC, AlamiR. M+: a scheme for multi robot cooperation through negotiated task allocation and achievement, Proceedings ofthe1999 IEEE International Conferenceon Robot ics&Automation, Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 1999. 1234~1239.

DOI: 10.1109/robot.1999.772530

Google Scholar

[2] Kapidakis S, MavronicolasM. Distributed, low contention task allocation [A]. Proceedings of the8th IEEE Symposiumon Parallel and Distributed Processing[C]. Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996. 358~365.

DOI: 10.1109/spdp.1996.570355

Google Scholar

[3] S. Rakshit and R.K. Guha, Fair Bandwidth Sharing in Distributed System: A Game-Theoretic Approach, IEEE Trans. Computers, 2005, 54: 1384-1393.

DOI: 10.1109/tc.2005.183

Google Scholar

[4] S.U. Khan and I. Ahmad, A Cooperative Game Theoretical Technique for Joint Optimization of Energy Consumption and Response Time in Computational Grids, IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed System, 2009, 20: 346-360.

DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2008.83

Google Scholar

[5] E. Koutsoupias and C. Papadimitriou, Worst-Case Equilibria [C], Proc. 16th Ann. Symp. Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STAC '99), 1999: 404-413.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-49116-3_38

Google Scholar

[6] R. Subrata, A. Y, Zomaya and B. Landfeldt, Game-theoretic Approach for Load Balancing in Computational Grids, IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed System, 2007, 19: 66-76.

DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2007.70710

Google Scholar

[7] R. Subrata A.Y. Zomaya and B. Landfeldt, A Cooperative Game Framework for QoS Guided Job Allocation Schemes in Grids, IEEE Trans. Computers, 2008, 57: 1413-1422.

DOI: 10.1109/tc.2008.79

Google Scholar

[8] W. Weihong and L. baochun, To Play or to Control: a Game-based Control-theoretic Approach to Peer-to-Peer Incentive Engineering, International Workshop on Quality of Service, 2003: 174-192.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44884-5_10

Google Scholar

[9] J. Omic, A. Orda and P. Van mieghem, Protecting Against Network Infections: A Game Theoretic Perspective, IEEE INFOCOM'09, 2009: 1485-1493.

DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2009.5062065

Google Scholar

[10] Roger B, Myerson . GAME THEORY, President and Fellows of Harvard College, (1991).

Google Scholar

[11] SHAPLEY L Stochastic games, Proc of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1953: 1095-1100.

Google Scholar

[12] LI Ping, YANG Yi-min, LIAN Jia-lie. Layered task allocation in multi-root systems, Proc of Global Congress on Intelligent Systems, 2009: 62-67.

DOI: 10.1109/gcis.2009.206

Google Scholar

[13] VELOSO M, STONE P. Individual and Collaborative Behaviors In a Team of Homogeneous Robotic Soccer Agents[C]. Proc of ICMAS. 1988: 309-316.

DOI: 10.1109/icmas.1998.699074

Google Scholar

[14] DIAS M B, STENTZ A. A market approach to multirobot Coordination, CMU-RI-TR-01-26, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Robotics Institute, Camegie Mellon University, (2001).

Google Scholar