Literature Review of Studies on Self-Centering Bridge Pier Joint

Abstract:

A self-centering bridge pier joint consists of energy dissipaters and elastic recovery devices. Energy dissipaters such as energy dissipating bars and dampers can dissipate enough energy; and elastic recovery devices like unbounded prestressed tendons can reduce the post earthquake residual deformation. Combined with relevant literature in this field, this paper analyzes the research status in terms of experimental research, numerical simulation and engineering application of self-centering bridge pier joints and proposes a direction for future research.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 933)
• Pages: 276-280
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.933.276
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Juan Juan Wen*, Li Yun Yi
• Keywords: Joint, Literature Review, Self-Centering Bridge Pier

References

[1] Wang Kehai, Research on Aseismic Design of Bridges, 1st ed. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, (2007).

[2] Kazuhiko Kawashima, and Kinji Hasegawa, New seismic design specifications of highway bridges in Japan, Earthquake spectra, vol. 10, pp.333-356, April (1994).

DOI: 10.1193/1.1585777

[3] G. A. MacRae, and Kazuhiko Kawashima, Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 26, pp.701-716, (1997).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199707)26:7<701::aid-eqe671>3.0.co;2-i

[4] Kazuhiko Kawashima, and G.A. MacRae, et al, Residual Displacement Response Spectrum, Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 124, pp.523-530, (1998).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1998)124:5(523)

[5] Kazuhiko Kawashima, and Kinji Hasegawa. Experimental investigation on nonlinear seismic response of bridge columns and accuracy of equal energy assumption, Proc. Japan Soc. of Civ. Engrg., vol. 483, pp.137-146, (1994).

DOI: 10.2208/jscej.1994.483_137

[6] P. Fajfar, and H. Krawinkler, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Rotterdam, Netherlands, (1996).

DOI: 10.1201/9780203740019

[7] LV Xilin, CHEN Yun, and MAO Yuanjun, New Concept of Structural Seismic Design: Earthquake Resilient Structures, Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), vol. 39, pp.941-948, (2011).

[8] M. J. Nigel Priestley, Seismic Design Philosophy for Precast Concrete Frames, Structural Engineering International, vol. 6, pp.25-31, (1996).

DOI: 10.2749/101686696780496003

[9] J. Stanton, W. C. Stone, and G. S. Cheok, A hybrid reinforced precast frame for seismic regions, PCI Journal, vol. 42, pp.20-32, (1997).

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.03011997.20.23

[10] S. Pampanin, M. J . Nigel Priestley, et al, Analytical modeling of the seismic behavior of precast concrete frames designed with ductile connections, Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 5, pp.329-367, (2001).

DOI: 10.1080/13632460109350397

[11] C. Christopoulos, A. Filiatrault, C. M. Uang, et al, Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames, Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 128, pp.1111-1120, (2002).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1111)

[12] C. Christopoulos, A. Filiatrault, et a, Seismic response of self-centring hysteretic SDOF systems, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, pp.1131-1150, (2002).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.152

[13] Wing-Pin Kwan, Unbonded Posttensioned Concrete Bridge Piers. II: Seismic Analyses, Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 8, pp.102-111, (2003).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2003)8:2(102)

[14] B. M. John, and Cheng Chin Tung, Seismic Resistance of Bridge Piers Based on Damage Avoidance Design, Technical Report NCEER-97-0014, vol. 109, (1997).

[15] Y. C. Kurama, R. Sause etal, Seismic Response Evaluation of Unbonded Post-tensioned Precast Walls, ACI Structural Journal, vol. 99, pp.641-651, (2002).

DOI: 10.14359/12304

[16] Palermo, S. Pampanin et al, Use of "controlled rocking" in the seismic design of bridges, in Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, (2004).

[17] S. Pampanin, Emerging Solutions for High Seismic Performance of Precast/Prestressed Concrete Buildings, Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, vol. 3, pp.207-223, (2005).

DOI: 10.3151/jact.3.207

[18] D. Marriott, A. Palermo, and S. Pampanin, Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of damage resistant bridge piers with hybrid connections, in Proceedings of First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, (2006).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.857

[19] D. Marriott, S. Pampanin, and A. Palermo. Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters , Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 38, pp.331-354, (2009).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.857

[20] D. Marriott, S. Pampanin, and A. Palermo, Biaxial testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replacable dissipaters, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 40, p.1723–1741, Dec. (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1112

[21] J. GUO, K. G. XIN, M. HE, and L. HU, An analytical model of a self-centering bridge pier system, " in Proc. 20th National Structural Engineering Semina, Ningbo China, 2011, pp.294-300.

[22] M. H. HE, K. G. XIN, and J. GUO, Local Stability Study of New Bridge Piers with Self-centering Joints, Engineering Mechanics, vol. 29, pp.122-127, April, (2012).

[23] J. GUO, K. G. XIN, M.H. HE, Experimental study and analysis on the seismic performance of a self-centering bridge pier, Engineering Mechanics, vol. 2Suppl. I, pp.29-34, June, (2012).