Green Building Components Used in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Design Studio

Article Preview

Abstract:

Buildings are accounted for around half of worldwide energy consumptions, significantly contributing to global warming and the alteration of natural ecosystems, as proved by recent reports. The role of higher education as a means of comprehensively introducing new generations of architects to the principles and practices of sustainable environmental design is becoming highly significant, although this faces a number of pedagogical and professional barriers. The aim of this study was to identify green building components used in the pedagogcal approach in environmental design studio and to present the state of sustainable education technological practice in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). The method used was through observatory studies of environmental design studio for a whole semester to identify the pedagogies used in teaching the environmental design. Lecture inputs, experiment, site visit, field trip, crit, pin up crit and assessment were pedagogies used for the environmental studio were identified as the pedagogy used and the most observed components are active and passive while the activitiespost occupancy are seldom used.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

44-47

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hamdan, M. & Bashir, F. M. Implementing Components of Sustainable Design through the Integration of Given and Hidden Curriculum in Architectural studies. Bridging Between Old & New: Towards Future Sustainable Built Environment 2012 KALAM 5 – 7th November, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] Bashir, F. M., Hamdan, A. M., Dodo, Y.A. & Ojobo, H. I. Embedding Components of Sustainable Design in Our Undergraduate Architectural Curriculum for Effective Power Delivery in Planning of Our Cities. NIA, Archibuilt 2012 Annual Exposition of Building Material and Construction Technology 21-25 August, 2012. Ladi Kwali Hall, Sheraton Hotels, & Towers: Abuja, Nigeria. pp.44-56.

Google Scholar

[3] Abdul Rahman, A., & Abdussamad, M. H. Reinventing the Architectural Education in the Institutes of Higher Learning: Sustainability versus Iconic, Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Architects 22 (1) 64-69. (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] Warburton, K. Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4 (1), 44-56. (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Lechner, N. Sustainable Strategies in Tropical Climate. A Seminar Lecture delivered in the Seminar room B03 at the Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, on 1st October, (2013).

Google Scholar

[6] McDonough, W., and M. Braungart. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point, (2002).

DOI: 10.1017/s1466046609990494

Google Scholar

[7] Orr, D. W. The Nature of Design: Ecology, Culture, and Human Intention. New York: Oxford University Press, (2002).

Google Scholar

[8] Rutherford, P. & Wilson, R. Educating environmental awareness: creativity in integrated environmental design teaching. In Shannon, S., Soebarto, V., Williamson, T., (Eds. ) Challenges for architectural science in changing climates: Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the Architectural Science Association ANZAScA. Adelaide: School of Architecture. (2006).

Google Scholar

[9] Guy, S., Moore, S.A. Sustainable Architecture and the Pluralist Imagination. Journal of Architectural Education, 60(4), 15-23. (2007).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1531-314x.2007.00104.x

Google Scholar