Influence of Pre-Generated Infinite Adhesive Defects on the Forming Behaviour of Adhesive Bonded Steel Sheets

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present investigation, the forming behaviour of adhesive bonded sheets with the pre-generated infinite defects in the adhesive layer is studied. The infinite defects are generated with different orientations like longitudinal, transverse and at an angle of 45°. The base sheet materials used are deep drawing quality steel and SS 316L sheets, and two part epoxy adhesive is used for bonding the base sheet materials. The formability is quantified by monitoring the load-extension behaviour, and limit strain, evaluated through tensile tests and in-plane plane strain (IPPS) formability tests. It is observed that there is a significant decrease in formability because of the presence of infinite defects in the adhesive layer. While comparing the formability of adhesive bonded blanks with respect to different orientations, transversely oriented defect shows more reduction than 45° and longitudinal cases. There is not much difference between the transversely oriented and 45° oriented infinite defects in tensile tests, whereas in the IPPS formability test results, there is no considerable difference between 45° and longitudinally oriented defect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

328-335

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Olia, J. N. Rossettos, Analysis of adhesively bonded joints, with gaps subjected to bending Int. J. solids structure. 33(18) (1996) 2681 – 2693.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00168-9

Google Scholar

[2] J. N. Rossettos, P. Lin, H. Nayeb-Hashemi, Comparison of the effects of debonds and voids in adhesive joints, J. Engineering Materials and Tech. 116 (1994) 533 – 538.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2904324

Google Scholar

[3] M.F.S.F. de Moura, R. Daniaud, A.G. Magalhaes, Simulation of mechanical behaviour of composite bonded joints containing strip defects, Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives. 26 (2006) 464–473.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.06.010

Google Scholar

[4] G. D'Urso, G. Maccarini, The formability of aluminum foam sandwich panels, Int. J. Materials Forming, 5 (2012) 243–257.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-011-1036-9

Google Scholar

[5] M. H. Parsa, M. Ettehad, P. H. Matin, S. Nasher, Al Ahkami, Experimental and numerical determination of limiting drawing ratio of Al3105- polypropylene-Al3105 sandwich sheets, J. Engineering Materials and Tech. 132 (2010) 031004-1 – 031004-11.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4001264

Google Scholar

[6] Huntsman Advanced materials (India) private Ltd., Test report of Araldite AW106 (Batch No: 1011GOA16) and HV 953 IN (Batch No: 1011GOA17), (Standard Epoxy Structural Adhesive), Dated on 11/01/(2012).

Google Scholar

[7] Metallurgical testing laboratory services (MTLS), Certificate of analysis of SS 316L, No. K/6951, dated on 11/04/(2012).

Google Scholar

[8] Tata steel, Test certificate - IS 513 Grade-CR1, Licence No. CM/L-51524.

Google Scholar

[9] V. Satheeshkumar, R. Ganesh Narayanan, Experimental investigation on the influence of adhesive properties on forming behaviour of adhesive bonded steel sheets, Proceedings of IDDRG 2012, Mumbai, India, Part II (2012) 508 – 513.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.939.328

Google Scholar

[10] V. Satheeshkumar, R. Ganesh Narayanan, Investigation on the influence of adhesive properties on the formability of adhesive bonded steel sheets, Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. (2013).

DOI: 10.1177/0954406213488727

Google Scholar