The Fatigue Behavior of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Composite T300/Epoxy under Tension-Tension and Bending Fatigue Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main objective of this work is to compare the different fracture behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced composite T300/epoxy with cross-play composite laminate. Tension-tension and three points bending fatigue are adopted, with optical microscopic and scanning electron microscopic observation of the specimen fracture surfaces. The specific objectives are: a) for tension-tension fatigue loading, the onset and multiplication of transverse matrix cracks continuously improve the delamination. Consequently, fibers rupture occurs in this locally region with high density of cracks. b) The density of intralaminar cracks increases with number of fatigue cycles. c) During the shear stress distribution under three points bending fatigue, delamination which is the main characteristic of T300/epoxy, initiates from the central and propagates alone the neutral axis of the sample. And a small quantity of fiber breakage occurs in the maximal compress region.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 941-944)

Pages:

1522-1527

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Harris, Bryan: Fatigue in composites: science and technology of the fatigue response of fibre-reinforced plastics ( Woodhead Publishing, New York 2003).

Google Scholar

[2] J.W. Lee, I.M. Daniel: Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 24 (1990), p.122.

Google Scholar

[3] R.C. Alderliesten: Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 35 (2013), p.370.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Nikishkov, A. Makeev, G. Seon: International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 48 (2013), p.266.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Argüelles, P. Coronado, et al. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 56 (2013), p.93.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Liang, P.B. Gning, L. Guillaumat: International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 63 (2014), p.36.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Seon, A. Makeev, et al. Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 89 (2013), p.194.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Coronado, A. Argüelles, J. Viña, et al. Composite Structures, Vol. 112 (2014), p.188.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Takeda, M. Miura, et al. Cryogenics, Vol. 58 (2013), p.55.

Google Scholar

[10] de Vasconcellos, D. S.F. Touchard, et al. International Journal of Fatigue Vol. 59 (2014), p.159.

Google Scholar

[11] R.C. Alderliesten: Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 35 (2013), p.370.

Google Scholar

[12] L.Y. Xiaoxue Diao, Yiu-Wing Mai: Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 54 (1995), p.329.

Google Scholar

[13] R.B. Toumi, J. Renard, et al. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 66 (2013), p.723.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Makeev: Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 80 (2013) , p.93.

Google Scholar

[15] E.G. Koricho, G. Belingardi, A.T. Beyene: Composite Structures, Vol. 111 (2014), p.169.

Google Scholar