Restrained Shrinkage Behavior of Concrete under Different Environmental Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

The ring test method is used to evaluate the behavior of concrete under restrained shrinkage. Four kinds of environmental conditions (20±1°C, RH60±5%; 35±1°C, RH60±5%; 50±1°C, RH15±5%; 65±1°C, RH15±5%) were designed to investigate the effect the environmental condition on the shrinkage behavior of concrete prepared with different kinds of mineral admixtures. The results show that higher temperature and lower relative humidity can increase the risk of shrinkage cracking. The addition of different mineral admixtures increases the shrinkage of concrete at room conditions. In the case of higher temperature and lower relative humidity, the addition of mineral admixtures can delay the shrinkage cracking in the test duration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 941-944)

Pages:

835-841

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Cook W D, Miao B, Aïtcin P C and Mitchell D: Thermal stresses in large high-strength concrete columns, volume 89 of ACI Mater J (1992), pp.61-68.

Google Scholar

[2] Ulm F J and Coussy O: Couplings in early-age concrete: from material modelling to structural design, volume 35 Inter J Solids Struct (1998), p.4295–4311.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(97)00317-x

Google Scholar

[3] Cusson D and Hoogeveen T: An experimental approach for the analysis of early-age behavior of high performance concrete structures under restrained shrinkage, volume 37 of Cement Concrete Res (2007), p.200–209.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.005

Google Scholar

[4] Wiegrink K, Marikunte S and Shah SP, in: Shrinkage cracking of highstrength concrete, volume 93 ACI Mater J (1996), chapter 5.

Google Scholar

[5] Grzybowski M and Shah SP, in: Shrinkage cracking of fiber reinforcedconcrete, volume 87 ACI Mater J (1990), chapter 2.

Google Scholar

[6] Weiss W J and Shah S P: Restrained shrinkage cracking: the role ofshrinkage reducing admixtures and specimen geometry, volume 35 of Mater Struct (2002), p.85–91.

DOI: 10.1617/13799

Google Scholar

[7] Shah S, Karaguler M and Sarigaphuti M: Effects of shrinkage-reducing admixtures on restrained shrinkage of concrete, volume 89 of ACI Mater J (1992), chapter 3, p.289–295.

DOI: 10.14359/2593

Google Scholar

[8] Shah S, Ouyang C, Marikunte S, Yang W and Becq-Giraudon E: A method to predict shrinkage cracking of concrete, volume 959 of ACI Mater J (1998), chapter 4, p.339–346.

Google Scholar

[9] See H T, Attiogbe E K and Miltenberger M: Shrinkage cracking characteristics of concrete using ring specimens, volume 100 of ACI Mater J (2003), chapter 3, p.239–245.

DOI: 10.14359/12625

Google Scholar

[10] Igarashi S, Bentur A and Kovler K: Autogenous shrinkage and induced restraining stresses in high-strength concrete, volume30 of Cement Concrete Res (2000), p.1701–1707.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00399-9

Google Scholar

[11] Shi C J, Tong B H and He F Q: Introduction and application of ASTM standard test method for cracking and induced tensile stress characteristics of mortar and concrete under restrained shrinkage, volume 6 of Concrete (2011), pp.5-11. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.1520/c1581-04

Google Scholar

[12] Briffaut M, Benboudjema F, Torrenti J M and Nahas G: A thermal active restrained shrinkage ring test to study the early age concrete behavior of massive structures, volume 41 of Cement Concrete Res (2011), pp.56-63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.006

Google Scholar