Reliability Modeling for Systems Subject to Interactional Competing Failure Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

For complex systems or items that experience multiple dependent competing failure processes, the dependency among the failure processes presents challenging issues in reliability modeling. This article, discusses the dependence of the degradation failure processes and the traumatic failure process. On the condition of passion shock processes, a degradation failure reliability model is developed with the wiener degradation processes. By the influence of the degradation, a traumatic failure reliability model is developed under weibull failure distribution. Then, we get system reliability model deals with mutual effect of the two processes. In additional, the parameters estimation of the reliability model is solved. An applied example demonstrated the model correctness and availability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 945-949)

Pages:

1063-1068

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lehmann,A Joint modeling of degradation and failure time data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2009, 139, 1693-1706.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.05.027

Google Scholar

[2] Kharoufeh J, Flinkelstein D, Mixon D. Availability of periodically inspected systems with Markovian wear and shocks. Journal of applied Probability 2006, 43(2), 303-317.

DOI: 10.1239/jap/1152413724

Google Scholar

[3] Jiang R discrete competing model with application to modeling bus-motor failure data. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2010, 95(9), 981-988.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.04.009

Google Scholar

[14] K.T. Huynh, A. Barros, C. Berenguer I.T. Castro, A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events[J]Reliability engineering and system safety, 2011, 99, 497-508.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.018

Google Scholar

[4] K.T. Huynh, A. Barros, C. Berenguer I.T. Castro, A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events[J]Reliability engineering and system safety, 2011, 99, 497-508.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.018

Google Scholar

[5] Xiao L etc, Condition-based maintenance for continuously monitored degrading systems with multiple failure modes[J] IIE Transactions, 2013, 45, 422-435.

DOI: 10.1080/0740817x.2012.690930

Google Scholar

[6] Yaping Wang and Hoang Pham, Modeling the dependent competing risks with multiple degradation processes and random shock using time-varying copulas[J]IEEEE Transactions on reliability, 2013, 61, 13-22.

DOI: 10.1109/tr.2011.2170253

Google Scholar

[7] Hao peng, Qianmei feng and David w. coit, Reliability and maintenance modeling for systems subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes[J]IIE Transactions, 2011, 43, 11-22.

DOI: 10.1080/0740817x.2010.491502

Google Scholar

[8] Cox D R, Miller H D. The Theory of Stochastic Processes[M]. London: Chapman and Hall, (1965).

Google Scholar

[9] Bagdonavičius V, Nilkulin M S. Estimation in Degradation Models with Explanatory Variables[J]. Lifetime Data Analysis, 2000, 7(1): 85-103.

Google Scholar

[10] Liao H, Zhao W, Guo H. Predicting remaining useful life of an individual unit using Proportional Hazards Model and Logistic Regression Model[C]/Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006. Newport Beach, CA, 2006: 127-132.

DOI: 10.1109/rams.2006.1677362

Google Scholar

[11] Bagdonavičius V, Nikulin M. Statistical Models to Analyze Failure, Wear, Fatigue, and Degradation Data with Explanatory Variables[J]. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 2009, 38(16-17): 3031-3047.

DOI: 10.1080/03610920902947519

Google Scholar

[12] Pennell M L, Whitmore G A, Lee M-L T. Bayesian random-effects threshold regression with application to survival data with non proportional hazards[J]. Biostatistics, 2010, 11(1): 111-126.

DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp041

Google Scholar

[13] Meeker W Q, Escobar L A. Statistical methods for reliability data[ M] . New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998: 324-325.

Google Scholar