A Semantic Annotation Framework to Assist the Knowledge Interoperability along a Product Life Cycle

Abstract:

The interoperability among a variety of systems, in or across manufacturing enterprises, has been widely accepted as one of the important factors that affects the efficiency of production. The aim of this study is to deal with the semantic interoperability issues in a product lifecycle management environment. Through the investigation of related works, the need for the formalization of semantic annotation was discovered. This paper addresses this drawback and introduces a framework that uses formalized semantic annotations to assist the knowledge interoperability along a product life cycle.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 945-949)
• Pages: 424-429
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.945-949.424
• Online since: June 2014
• Authors: Yong Xin Liao*, Mario Lezoche, Eduardo Rocha Loures, Hervé Panetto, Nacer Boudjlida
• Keywords: Formalization, Knowledge Engineering, Product Life Cycle, Semantic Annotation, Semantic Interoperability

References

[1] F. Ameri and D. Dutta, Product lifecycle management: closing the knowledge loops, Comput. -Aided Des. Appl., vol. 2, no. 5, p.577–590, (2005).

DOI: 10.1080/16864360.2005.10738322

[2] A. Geraci, F. Katki, L. McMonegal, B. Meyer, J. Lane, P. Wilson, J. Radatz, M. Yee, H. Porteous, and F. Springsteel, IEEE standard computer dictionary: Compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. IEEE Press, (1991).

DOI: 10.1109/ieeestd.1991.106963

[3] A. Etienne, E. Guyot, D. V. Wijk, and L. Roucoules, Specifications and development of interoperability solution dedicated to multiple expertise collaboration in a design framework, Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, p.272–294, (2011).

DOI: 10.1504/ijplm.2011.043181

[4] T. R. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, Knowl. Acquis., vol. 5, no. 2, p.199–220, (1993).

[5] F. Song, G. Zacharewicz, and D. Chen, An ontology-driven framework towards building enterprise semantic information layer, Adv. Eng. Inform., vol. 27, no. 1, p.38–50, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2012.11.003

[6] S. Bergamaschi, D. Beneventano, A. Corni, E. Kazazi, M. Orsini, L. Po, and S. Sorrentino, The Open Source release of the MOMIS Data Integration System., in SEBD, 2011, p.175–186.

[7] M. Attene, F. Robbiano, M. Spagnuolo, and B. Falcidieno, Characterization of 3D shape parts for semantic annotation, Comput. -Aided Des., vol. 41, no. 10, p.756–763, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2009.01.003

[8] C. Li, Ontology-Driven Semantic Annotations for Multiple Engineering Viewpoints in Computer Aided Design, University of Bath, (2012).

[9] C. Di Francescomarino, Semantic annotation of business process models, University of Trento, (2011).

[10] Y. Lin, Semantic annotation for process models: Facilitating process knowledge management via semantic interoperability, (2008).

[11] N. Boudjlida, H. Panetto, S. Baïna, C. Diamantini, J. Krogstie, Y. Lin, J. Sarraipa, N. Zouggar, A. Hahn, and M. Delgado, DTG4. 2: Experimental Semantic Enrichment of Enterprise Models for Interoperability and its Practical Impact, (2007).

[12] W3C, Semantic Annotations for WSDL and XML Schema, 2007. [Online]. Available: http: /www. w3. org/TR/2007/REC-sawsdl-20070828.

[13] R. L. Ackoff, From data to wisdom, J. Appl. Syst. Anal., vol. 16, p.3–9, (2010).

[14] S. Pokraev, D. Quartel, M. W. Steen, and M. Reichert, Semantic service modeling: Enabling system interoperability, in Enterprise Interoperability, Springer, 2007, p.221–230.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-714-5_21

[15] J. Miller and J. Mukerji, MDA Guide Version 1. 0. 1, Object Manag. Group, vol. 234, p.51, (2003).

[16] Y. Liao, M. Lezoche, E. Loures, H. Panetto, and N. Boudjlida, Semantic Enrichment of Models to Assist Knowledge Management in a PLM environment, in On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Conferences, 2013, p.267–274.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_17