Particulate Size Distribution in the Haze and Non-Haze Episodes at Shijiazhuang City, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aimed at detecting the particulate size distributions in the typical air pollution city of Shijiazhuang, China, this research collected samples in haze episode and non-haze episode separately and found the difference between the two situations. In non-haze episode, the average size distribution is a U-shape curve both lifting at the size minimum and maximum, with slightly higher frequency in the size below 0.65μm (grade 1 and grade 2); but in haze episode, the frequency of 0.43~0.65μm (grade 2) and 0.65~1.1μm (grade 3) increase evidently. By the correlation coefficient calculation, the mass concentration of PM0.43~0.65 has strong negative relationship with visibility range, which should be responsible for the low visibility formation. The fitting function demonstrates that the mass concentration of PM0.43~0.65 must be limited below 0.117 mg/m3 if the visibility range reaches 10km (“medium”), and below 0.006 mg/m3 over 19km (“good”). And there is a inflection point around 0.01 mg/m3 of PM0.43~0.65 as for the visiblity variation, in which the visiblity range decreases rapidly with slight increase of PM0.43~0.65 when below 0.001 mg/m3. PM0.43~0.65 is conclusively regarded as the feature size of particulate responsible for the haze formation in Shijiazhuang, China.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

1297-1300

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. Zhuang, Y. Wang, H. He, J. Liu, X. Wang, T. Zhu, M. Ge, J. Zhou, G. Tang and J. Ma: J. Environ. Sci. Vol. 26 (2014), p.2.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Ji, Y. Wang, L. Wang, L. Chen, B. Hu,G. Tang, J. Xin, T. Song, T. Wen, Y. Sun,Y. Pan and Z, Liu: Atmos. Environ. Vol. 50 (2012), p.338.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Zhang, L. Xu, J. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Niu, T. Lei, C. Li and J. Zhao: Particuology Vol. 11 (3) (2013), p.264.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Lee and A.G. Russell: Atmos. Environ. Vol. 41 (40) (2007), p.9616.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Cheng, J. Lang, Y. Zhou, L. Han, G. Wang and D. Chen: Atmos. Environ. Vol. 79 (2013), p.308.

Google Scholar

[6] St. Pateraki, D.N. Asimakopoulos, A. Bougiatioti, Th. Maggos, Ch. Vasilakos and N. Mihalopulos: Sci. Total Environ. Vol. 470-480 (2014), p.210.

Google Scholar

[7] V.K. Sharma and R.S. Patil: Atmos. Environ. Part B. Vol. 26(1) (1992), p.135.

Google Scholar

[8] Information on http: /113. 108. 142. 147: 20035/emcpublish.

Google Scholar

[9] N.P. Hyslop: Atmos. Environ. Vol. 43(1) (2009), p.182.

Google Scholar