Evaluation of the Multistage Biological-Ecological Process for Removal of Organic Matter and Nutrient from the Rural Domestic Wastewater under Ambient Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

The rural domestic wastewater system has been evaluated by using a pilot scale of a biological – ecological process which was built and monitored under operation for a long time. The system was operated for six months with an ambient temperature ranged of (5 – 22°C). The process used in this study was set up as a modified anaerobic/anoxic/oxic process followed by a constructed wetland. Stability and acclimatization of the anaerobic bacteria was achieved after 35 days by using glucose and trace nutrient. The system was then continuously operated with a real domestic wastewater. Hydraulic retention time and temperature are more important parameters of the biological-ecological process performance. Therefore, the system was operated with different HRT and temperature to evaluate the performance efficiency. The influent and effluent of the chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) were analyzed. The anaerobic reactor showed that the optimal HRT was 4 days and the reactor demonstrated a removal efficiency rate of COD (55.5%). The average biogas production in the summer season was 6.8 l/d and in the winter was 1.24 l/d. The Biological– ecological process revealed good efficiency in the removal of the COD, total nitrogen and total phosphorous, where the maximum average removal was 85.5%, 79.8%, 74.9% respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

2133-2138

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. W. H. V. Hulle, N. Ghyselbrecht, T. J. L. Vermeiren, V. Depuydt, and C. Boeckaert, Individual treatment of hotel and restaurant waste water in rural areas, Environmental Technology, vol. 33, pp.653-661, (2012).

DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2011.587025

Google Scholar

[2] H. Liang, M. Gao, J. Liunding, Y. Wei, and X. Guo, A novel integrated step-feed biofilm process for the treatment of decentralized domestic wastewater in rural areas of China, Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 22, pp.321-327, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(09)60111-x

Google Scholar

[3] W. Zeng, L. Li, Y. Yang, S. Wang, and Y. Peng, Nitritation and denitritation of domestic wastewater using a continuous anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic (A(2)O) process at ambient temperatures, Bioresource Technology, vol. 101 pp.8074-8082, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.098

Google Scholar

[4] E. T. Lim, G. T. Jeong, S. H. Bhang, S. H. Park, and D. H. Park, Evaluation of pilot-scale modified A2O processes for the removal of nitrogen compounds from sewage, Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, pp.6149-6154, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.072

Google Scholar

[5] Alberto López-Lópeza, María Guadalupe Albarrán-Rivasb, Leonel Hernández-Menaa, and E. León-Becerrila, An assessment of an anaerobic filter packed with a low-cost material for treating domestic wastewater, Environmental Technology, vol. 34, pp.1151-1159, (2013).

DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2012.743588

Google Scholar

[6] R. Rajakumar;, T. Meenambal;, J. R. Banu;, and I. T. Yeom, Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in upflow anaerobic filter under low upflow velocity, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., vol. 8, pp.149-158, (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/bf03326204

Google Scholar

[7] A. Abdelgadir, X. Chen, J. Liu, X. Xie, J. Zhang, K. Zhang, H. Wang, and N. Liu, Characteristics, Process Parameters, and Inner Components of Anaerobic Bioreactors, Biomed Res Int, vol. 2014, p.841573, (2014).

DOI: 10.1155/2014/841573

Google Scholar

[8] D. Hanbay, A. Baylar, and M. Batanb, Prediction of aeration efficiency on stepped cascades by using least square support vector machines, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, p.4248–4252, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.003

Google Scholar

[9] Z. Qiang, H. Dong, B. Zhu, J. Qu, and Y. Nie, A comparison of various rural wastewater treatment processes for the removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), Chemosphere vol. 92, pp.986-992, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.03.019

Google Scholar

[10] APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th edition. American Public Health Association. Washington, DC 20005, (1992).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Chen, B. Rößler, S. Zielonka, A. -M. Wonneberger, and A. Lemmer, Effects of Organic Loading Rate on the Performance of a Pressurized Anaerobic Filter in Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion, Energies, vol. 7, pp.736-750, (2014).

DOI: 10.3390/en7020736

Google Scholar

[12] L. Wang, Y. -Z. Y. Peng, J. Ma, Y. Liu, and N. -P. N. Ma, Effects of COD/TN and HRT(s) on nutrients removal by an alternating anoxic/oxic CAST, Environmental Science & Technology vol. 31, pp.2370-2375, (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] . John Leju Celestino LADU et al. Application of A2/O bio-reactor & constructed wetlands for removing organic and nutrient concentrations from rural domestic sewag, International Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 4, pp.709-718, (2014).

Google Scholar