Exceptional High Contribution of Metabolic Effects to Stable Carbon Isotope Composition of Experimental Cultured Freshwater Bivalve Shell

Article Preview

Abstract:

The stable isotope compositions of bivalve shells have been widely used to reconstruct palaeoclimate, but the metabolic effect obscured the climatic and environmental significance of the carbon isotope composition. In order to assess the contribution of metabolic C to the shell and ascertain whether its variations have any environmental or physiological significance, Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) was bred in the laboratory last for one year; two shell samples (shell A and B) were selected at the end of the experiment to determine the carbon isotope composition of the shell increment that deposited during the experiment. The results indicated that ڄ13CA ranged from 4.76 to 2.09 and ڄ13CB from 8.49 to 2.89 . ڄ13C of shell A and B are both more negative than the predicted equilibrium value, indicated that the shells had used the metabolic carbon during the shell forming process. According to computation, the proportion of shell A was 32.0% to 52.0% (mean value 38.7%); and shell B was 42.7% to 92.1% (mean value 70.3%). Such exceptional high proportion of metabolic carbon to cultured C. fluminea shells quite different from the field C. fluminea shells and other previous studies results, and may suggest that the improper bred food that indicate by the slowly growth rate of species caused the bivalve abnormal biological behaviors, which induce complicated and exceptional metabolic effect. Therefore, it can be used as indicator of deviant food change events during bivalve growth.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

227-230

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Dettman D L, Reische A K, Lohmann K C: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 63(1999), p.1049.

DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00020-4

Google Scholar

[2] Gillikin D P, Lorrain A, Li M, Dehairs F: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 71(2007), p.2936.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.04.003

Google Scholar

[3] Grossman E L, Ku T L: Chemical Geology, Vol. 59(1986), p.59–74.

Google Scholar

[4] Poulain C, Lorrain A, Mas R, Gillikin D P, Dehairs F, Robert R, Paulet Y-M: Chemical Geology, Vol. 272(2010), p.75.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.02.006

Google Scholar

[5] Romanek C S, Grossman E L, Morse J W: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 56(1992), p.419.

Google Scholar

[6] Wanamaker A D, Kreutz K J, Borns H W, Introne D S, Feindel S, Funder S, Rawson P D, Barber B J: Paleoceanography, Vol. 22 (2007), PA2217, doi: 10. 1029/2006PA001352.

DOI: 10.1029/2006pa001352

Google Scholar

[7] Yan H, Lee X Q, Zhou H, Cheng H G, Peng Y, Zhou Z H: Geochemical Journal, Vol. 23(2009), p.379.

Google Scholar

[8] Yan H, Li Z X, Lee X Q, Zhou H, Cheng H G, Chen J: Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, Vol. 31(2012), p.103.

Google Scholar