A Strain of Chlorella sp. was Used for Chicken Manure Fermentation Broth Treatment and Bio-Crude Oil Feedstock Production

Article Preview

Abstract:

One of the useful applications of chicken manure fermentation broth was foliar fertilization production. However, the effluent generated during foliar fertilization production processing was high in ammonia concentration, which was hard to be disposed by activated sludge method. Selecting microalgae to treat this kind of wastewater can realize pollutants purification, nutrients recovery and bio-energy production. A strain of Chlorella sp. was used. Results showed that the effluent can be used for microalgae cultivation. The optimal ammonia in the third (TS) and second step (SS) effluent for Chlorella sp. growth was around 500 mg/L and the net growth rate was 49.2 and 51.0 mg/L, respectively. The optimal addition amount of inorganic carbon was 228.6 mg/L for TS to cultivate Chlorella sp. By adding carbon resource every other day with trace elements, biomass reached to the highest value of 915.6 mg/L at 9 day. Without any addition of nutrient, the mixture of TS and SS can realize biomass accumulation of 497.0 mg/L. The highest removal of NH4+-N could reach 40%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

2714-2720

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Yang, D. Zheng, Y. Liu, S.L. Li, Z.Y. Wang, L. Song and L.W. Deng: Renew. Energy Resour. Vol. 28 (2010), pp.42-47.

Google Scholar

[2] J.K. Pittman, A.P. Dean and O. Osundeko: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 102 (2011), pp.17-25.

Google Scholar

[3] I. Godos, H.O. Guzman, R. Soto, P.A. García-Encina, E. Becares, R. Muñoz and V.A. Vargas: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 102 (2011), pp.923-927.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.036

Google Scholar

[4] W. Mulbry, S. Kondrad, C. Pizarro and E. Kebede-Westhead: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 99 (2008), pp.8137-8142.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.073

Google Scholar

[5] H.J. Choi and S.M. Lee: Environ. Eng. Res Vol. 18 (2013), pp.235-239.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Kim, Z.Y. Liu, J.Y. Lee and T. Lu: Desalin. Water Treat. Vol. 51 (2013), pp.7800-7806.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Hernández, B. Riaño, M. Coca and M.C. García-González: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 135 (2013), pp.598-603.

Google Scholar

[8] L.F. Wu, P.C. Chen, A.P. Huang and C.M. Lee: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 113 (2012), pp.14-18.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Franchino, E. Comino, F. Bona, V.A. Riggio: Chemosphere Vol. 92 (2013), pp.738-44.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Brennan and P. Owende: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. Vol. 14 (2010), pp.557-577.

Google Scholar

[11] N.H. Norsker, M.J. Barbosa, M.H. Vermuë, R.H. Wijffels: Biotechnol. Adv. Vol. 29(2011), pp.24-27.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Zhou, L. Schideman, G. Yu and Y. Zhang: Energy Environ. Sci. Vol. 6 (2013), pp.3765-3779.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Park, H.F. Jin, B.R. Lim, K.Y. Park and K. Lee: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 101 (2010), pp.8649-8657.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Aslan and I. K. Kapdan: Ecol. Eng. Vol. 28 (2006), pp.64-70.

Google Scholar

[15] V. Makareviciene, V. Skorupskaite and V. Andruleviciute: Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. Vol. 12 (2013), pp.119-130.

Google Scholar

[16] N.J. Rothman, E.A. Canuel and A.J. Beck: Ecol. Eng. Vol. 52 (2013), pp.290-297.

Google Scholar