Effects of Tillage Practices on Top Layer Soil Moisture Content and Soil Porosity in Banana Plantation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Soil moisture content and soil porosity were measured in banana plantation under three tillage practices, including deep-tillage (DT), no-tillage (NT), and no-tillage plus straw cover (NTSC). In the experiments, the top layer soil was separated into three depth including 0~15 cm, 15~30 cm and 30 ~ 45 cm. The soil sampling were performed at four plant growth periods, including the stage of banana seedling (SBS), metaphase of banana (MB), the stage of pregnancy (SP) and pumping stage (PS). The results showed that: Among three depth of top layers, soil moisture content in 0~15 cm at four plant growth periods was lower than that in other two depth by three tillage practices. In 0~15 cm top layer soil, all the soil moisture at four plant periods by NTSC practice were highest. And all the soil moisture in soil treated by three tillage practices were increased with the plant growth. The soil porosity in this layer at SBS and MB stages by DT practice was significantly higher than that by NT and NTSC practices. In 15~30 cm layer soil, the soil moisture content and soil porosity at SBS stage was highest in the soil treated by DT practice compared to the that in soil treated by other two tillage practices. In 30~45 cm layer, the soil porosity at SBS stage by DT and NTSC practices were significantly lower than that by NT practice. At MB stage by DT practice it was significantly higher than that by other practices.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

3540-3543

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Cattan P, Cabidoche Y, Lacas J, et al. M Effects of tillage and mulching on runoff under banana ( Musa spp. ) on a tropical Andosol. Soil & Tillage Research, 2006, 86(1): 38-51.

DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2005.02.002

Google Scholar

[2] Xu S, Zhang R, Dong B et al. Effect of tillage practices on structural properties and content of organic carbon in tilth soil. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(2): 203-208. (in Chinese).

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1011.2009.00203

Google Scholar

[3] López-Fando, Pardo MT. Changes in soil chemical characteristics with different tillage practices in a semi-arid environment. Soil & Tillage Research, 2009, 104(2): 278 -284.

DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2009.03.005

Google Scholar

[4] Ruiz-Sánchez, Plana V, Ortuño M F, et al. Spatial root distribution of apricot trees in different soil tillage practices. Plant and Soil, 2005, 272(1): 211- 221.

DOI: 10.1007/s11104-004-4781-4

Google Scholar

[5] Iriarte, Alfredo, Rieradevall, et al. Environmental impacts and energy demand of rapeseed as an energy crop in Chile under different fertilization and tillage practices. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011, 35(10): 4305- 4315.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.022

Google Scholar

[6] Zee S. E, Shah S.H. H, Leijnse. A Soil chemical aspects of water management: modeling topsoil water, salt and sodicity dynamics. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2013(19): 2107-2112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.074

Google Scholar

[7] Sun Z, Kang Y, Jiang S. Effects of water application intensity, drop size and water application amount on the characteristics of topsoil pores under sprinkler irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95(7): 869-876.

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.02.011

Google Scholar