Genomics Approaches for Abiotic Stress in Crop Resources

Article Preview

Abstract:

Rapid progress of crop genomics is making possible to undertake detailed structural and functional comparisons of genes involved in various biological processes among important crops and other plant species. These genomics-based approaches aim to decipher the entire genome, including genic and intergenic regions, to gain insights into plant molecular responses which will in turn provide specific strategies for crop improvement,especially in abiotic stresses. The objectives of this article are to review genomics approaches in crop resources and summarize to improve abiotic stresses by genomics. At last, we look forward and consider the significant of genomics approaches for abiotic stress in crop resources.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

3709-3712

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] FAO. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations. (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Von Braun. Nature, 465, 548–549. (2010).

Google Scholar

[3] A.P. Dhanapal. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 3, 378-385. (2012).

Google Scholar

[4] D. Bouchez ,H. H. ofte, Plant Physiology, 118(3): 725–732. (1998).

Google Scholar

[5] K. Yamamoto and T. Sasaki, Plant Molecular Biology, 35( 1-2): 135–144(1997).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Schena, D. Shalon R.W. Davis, and P. O. Brown, Science, 270, (5235): 467–470. (1995).

Google Scholar

[7] D. J. Lockhart, H. Dong, M. C. Byrne et al., Nature Biotechnology, 14, (13): 1675–1680. (1996).

Google Scholar

[8] W. A. Rensink and C. R. Buell, Trends in Plant Science, 10, (12): 603–609. (2005).

Google Scholar

[9] R.K. Varshney, S.N. Nayak, G.D. May, andS.A. Jackson, Trends in Biotechnology, 27(9): 522–530. (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] E.M.J. Salentijn, , A. Pereira, , G.C. Angenent, , C.G. van der Linden, F. Krens, M.J.M. Smulders, and B. Vosman, Molecular Breeding, 20, 1-13. (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s11032-006-9069-3

Google Scholar

[11] A.L. Caicedo, and M.D. Purugganan, Plant Physiology, 2, 545-547. (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] B. A. AkpJnar, J. L. Stuart and H. Budak, The ScientificWorld Journal, Article ID 361921, 9 pages. (2013).

Google Scholar

[13] F. Qin, K. Shinozaki, and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, Plant and Cell Physiology, 52(9):. 1569–1582. (2011).

DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcr106

Google Scholar

[14] M. Kantar, S. J. Lucas, andH. Budak, 445–493, Elsevier, Burlington, Mass, USA. (2011).

Google Scholar

[15] T. R. Sinclair, Trends in Plant Science, 16(6): 289–293. (2011).

Google Scholar

[16] C. M. McCallum, L. Comai, E. A. Greene, and S. Henikoff, Plant Physiology, 123(2): 439–442. (2000).

Google Scholar